138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7938495)
1. Can nurses be compelled to testify against co-workers? Case in point: Cenkovich v. Almeida 634 N.E. 2d 30--IL (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Aug; 35(3):4. PubMed ID: 7938495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal case briefs for nurses. NM: nurse sues surgeon for assault & battery with bone chisel; IL: simultaneous removal of catheter and tape: stands of care issue.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):3. PubMed ID: 1454994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The mystery of the missing heparin lock hub. Case in point: Denton v. Critikon, Inc. 674 So. 2d 1169--LA (1996).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Aug; 37(3):4. PubMed ID: 8920461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurses fail to listen to patient's complaints. Case in point: Harmon v. Patel 617 N.E. 2d 183--IL (1993).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Oct; 34(5):2. PubMed ID: 8248493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Polygraph tests for nurses ordered. Case in point: Marsh v. Lake Forest Hospital (519 N.E. 2d 504 (1988)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):2. PubMed ID: 3368575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nurses fail to keep physicians informed of multiple seizures. Case in point: Glassman v. St. Joseph Hospital 631 N.E. 2d 1186--IL (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jun; 35(1):4. PubMed ID: 8047646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are you held to the standard of a nurse specialist? Case in point: Northern Trust Co. v. Louis A. Weiss Mem. Hosp. (493 N.E. 2d 5 - IL).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Aug; 27(3):2. PubMed ID: 3638741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal case briefs for nurses. LA.: nurse inserts catheter over pt.'s objection: battery; IL.: nurse leaves station--termination: at will employment.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jun; 32(1):3. PubMed ID: 1862214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians not qualified as experts on nursing care. Case on point: Sullivan v. Edward Hospital, 2004 WL 228956 N.E.2d--IL.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Mar; 44(10):4. PubMed ID: 15085702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal case briefs for nurses. ID: refusal to meet supervisor without witness: termination for misconduct; GA: nurse sued for negligent i.v. site selection: standard of care issue.
Tammeleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):3. PubMed ID: 1509090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Attorney ordered to turn over nurse's notes. Case on point: Cangelosi v. Capasso, no. 2-05-0643 (Ill app. 05/30/2006) N.E.2d-IL.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jul; 47(2):4. PubMed ID: 16937914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
Regan WA
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nursing error not the cause of delay of correct patient diagnosis. Gill v. Foster.
Swisher KN
J Healthc Risk Manag; 1994; 14(3):36-8. PubMed ID: 10184118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal case briefs for nurses. OR: workers compensation: complications; IL: criminal law: signing doctor's name.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Sep; 28(4):3. PubMed ID: 2958897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why wasn't 'continuous treatment' doctrine applied? Case on point: Knox v. Greenville Hospital System, 2005 WL 20007 S.E.2d--SC.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jan; 45(8):2. PubMed ID: 15754900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Did deplorable nursing result in pyoderma gangrenosum? Case on point: Knight v. West Paces Ferry Hospital, Inc., 2003 WL 21384585 S.E.2d-GA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Aug; 44(3):4. PubMed ID: 14508922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nurses failed to check Dr.'s order: $2.3 million verdict. Case on point: Lovell v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center, 409-2409 (1/12/2010)-IL.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Feb; 50(9):2. PubMed ID: 20232663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
