These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7938738)
1. [Dosimetric and qualitative evaluations of the use of rhodium filtration in mammography]. Burke P; Luparia E; Frigerio A; Marra V; Milani R; Di Benedetto A; Simeone F Radiol Med; 1994 Sep; 88(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 7938738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences. Kimme-Smith C; Wang J; DeBruhl N; Basic M; Bassett LW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography]. Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose. Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic]. Küchler M; Friedrich M Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium. Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector]. Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography. Gingold EL; Wu X; Barnes GT Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose and image quality in mammography with an automatic beam quality system. Young KC; Ramsdale ML; Rust A Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):555-62. PubMed ID: 8757659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of radiation dose and image quality in mammography: a clinical evaluation of rhodium versus molybdenum. Monticciolo DL; Sprawls P; Kruse BD; Peterson JE South Med J; 1996 Apr; 89(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 8614878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study. Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system. Toroi P; Zanca F; Young KC; van Ongeval C; Marchal G; Bosmans H Eur Radiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2368-75. PubMed ID: 17268798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening. Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography. Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Optimization of exposure conditions for amorphous selenium direct conversion DR-based mammography system]. Endo T; Shiraiwa M; Oiwa M; Nishida C; Morita T; Yoshikawa K; Sato Y; Hayashi T; Ichihara S; Moritani S; Hirofuji Y; Wakayama T Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(9):1151-63. PubMed ID: 21937839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The factor of magnification in mammography]. Maggi S; Giuseppetti GM; Spiga G; Macchini M; Procaccini G; Gregori S; Amici F Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):101-6. PubMed ID: 2781053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short communication: kilovoltage measurement with rhodium target and filters on mammography X-ray machines. Underwood AC; Law J; Goodman DA; Robinson A; Rust A Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):769-73. PubMed ID: 8949681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]