BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7939489)

  • 1. Recognition failure and integration.
    Arlemalm T; Nilsson LG
    Scand J Psychol; 1994 Sep; 35(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 7939489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory.
    Kormi-Nouri R; Nilsson LG
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 9701961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions.
    Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG
    Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item-specific effects in recognition failure: reasons for rejection of the Tulving-Wiseman function.
    Lian A; Glass AL; Raanaas RK
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):692-707. PubMed ID: 9701962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multinomial modeling analysis of the recognition-failure paradigm.
    Riefer DM; Batchelder WH
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):611-30. PubMed ID: 7476247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context effects in recall and recognition at various retention intervals.
    Culross RR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1216-8. PubMed ID: 1501990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exceptions to recognition failure as a function of the encoded association between cue and target.
    Bryant DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 2017044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The TECO theory and lawful dependency in successive episodic memory tests.
    Sikström S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):693-728. PubMed ID: 10994226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition during recall failure: Semantic feature matching as a mechanism for recognition of semantic cues when recall fails.
    Cleary AM; Ryals AJ; Wagner SR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 26282623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recall and recognition of verbal paired associates in early Alzheimer's disease.
    Lowndes GJ; Saling MM; Ames D; Chiu E; Gonzalez LM; Savage GR
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Jul; 14(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 18577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Tulving-Wiseman law and the recognition of recallable music.
    Gardiner JM; Kaminska Z; Java RI; Clarke EF; Mayer P
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):632-7. PubMed ID: 2266864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
    von Essen JD
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.
    Nelson DL; Dyrdal GM; Goodmon LB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 16447386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recall and recognition measures of paired associate learning in healthy aging.
    Lowndes GJ; Saling MM; Ames D; Chiu E; Gonzalez LM; Savage G
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Jul; 15(4):506-22. PubMed ID: 18584342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successive tests of pair recognition.
    Sikström SP
    Memory; 1998 Sep; 6(5):531-54. PubMed ID: 10197162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.
    Shaw RJ; Craik FI
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.