These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7939489)

  • 21. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited.
    Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 11958356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accessing the particular from the general: the power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.
    Hunt RR; Smith RE
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 8881324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.
    Schreiber TA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 9610124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patterns of confidence loss in the cued recall of normal people with attenuated recognition memory: their relevance to a similar amnesic phenomenon.
    Meudell PR; Mayes AR
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 6709175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION THRESHOLDS, PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING, AND FREE RECALL AS A FUNCTION OF ABSTRACTNESS-CONCRETENESS AND WORD FREQUENCY.
    WINNICK WA; KRESSEL K
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Aug; 70():163-8. PubMed ID: 14341747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
    Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Duaal processes in recognition and in recognition failure.
    Richard Hanley J
    Mem Cognit; 1984 Nov; 12(6):575-80. PubMed ID: 21287047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are independent probes truly independent?
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identifying exceptions in a database of recognition failure studies from 1973 to 1992.
    Nilsson LG; Gardiner JM
    Mem Cognit; 1993 May; 21(3):397-410. PubMed ID: 8316103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
    Meltzer JA; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of colored separate and interactive pictures on cued recall.
    McKelvie SJ; Sano EK; Stout D
    J Gen Psychol; 1994 Jul; 121(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 7964665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On variability, Simpson's paradox, and the relation between recognition and recall: reply to Tulving and Flexser.
    Hintzman DL
    Psychol Rev; 1993 Jan; 100(1):143-8; discussion 149-53. PubMed ID: 8426879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implicit processing in the cued recall of young and old adults.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL; Holley PE; Stelnicki GS
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 1388861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contingent dissociation between recognition and fragment completion: the method of triangulation.
    Hayman CA; Tulving E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):228-40. PubMed ID: 2522512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On predicting the future states of awareness for recognition of unrecallable items.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 11958355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The development of attribute dominance in the knowledge base.
    Lindberg MA
    J Genet Psychol; 1989 Sep; 150(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 2809574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retrieval of action phrases: the efficacy of verb cues and noun cues.
    Mohr G
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1992; 200(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 1363014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of children's metacognitive experiences for cue utilization and monitoring accuracy: A longitudinal study.
    Roebers CM; Mayer B; Steiner M; Bayard NS; van Loon MH
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Oct; 55(10):2077-2089. PubMed ID: 31343230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.