These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7940464)

  • 1. [The milking machine as a cause of severe agitation in cows (and the farmer) during milking].
    Laevens H; Janssens A; de Kruif A; de Meulemeester L; Vandermeersch R
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1994 Sep; 119(17):495-9. PubMed ID: 7940464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows.
    Holst GE; Adrion F; Umstätter C; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4775-4786. PubMed ID: 33612232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting mouthpiece chamber vacuum in machine milking.
    Borkhus M; Rønningen O
    J Dairy Res; 2003 Aug; 70(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12916822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows.
    Odorčić M; Rasmussen MD; Paulrud CO; Bruckmaier RM
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s94-s99. PubMed ID: 31280747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Besier J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3096-3102. PubMed ID: 26830741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced liner-open phase and vacuum instead of prestimulation increase parlor efficiency in dairy cows.
    Tuor M; Jenni B; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 34955277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in cow teat tissue created by two types of milking cluster.
    Hillerton JE; Ohnstad I; Baines JR; Leach KA
    J Dairy Res; 2000 Aug; 67(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 11037228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a latency period between pre-stimulation and teat cup attachment and periodic vacuum reduction on milking characteristics and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Vetter A; van Dorland HA; Youssef M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Res; 2014 Feb; 81(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 24433587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Stauffer C; Feierabend M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9250-9260. PubMed ID: 32747105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood perfusion of teat tissue in dairy cows: Changes associated with pre-milking stimulation and machine milking.
    Wieland M; Shirky S; Gioia G; Sipka A; Virkler PD; Nydam DV; Älveby N; Porter IR
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6588-6599. PubMed ID: 32389482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on milkability, milk quality and milking irregularities of crossbred cows.
    Fahim A; Kamboj ML; Sirohi AS; Bhakat M; Mohanty TK
    J Dairy Res; 2019 May; 86(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 31169089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short communication: Effect of vacuum and ratio on the performance of a monoblock silicone milking liner.
    Spencer SB; Shin JW; Rogers GW; Cooper JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1725-8. PubMed ID: 17369212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition.
    Ambord S; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3588-94. PubMed ID: 20655427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for assessing teatcup liner performance during the peak milk flow period.
    Penry JF; Upton J; Leonardi S; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):649-660. PubMed ID: 29102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Milking performance and udder health of cows milked with two different liners.
    Rasmussen MD; Frimer ES; Kaartinen L; Jensen NE
    J Dairy Res; 1998 Aug; 65(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 9718489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Premilking teat preparation for Australian pasture-based cows milked by an automated milking system.
    Davis KL; Fulkerson WJ; Garcia SC; Dickeson D; Barchia IM
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2604-9. PubMed ID: 18565919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of milking, over-milking and vacuum levels on front and rear quarter teats in dairy cows.
    Vierbauch T; Peinhopf-Petz W; Wittek T
    J Dairy Res; 2021 Nov; 88(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 34924072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of pre-milking teat-brushing on milk processing time in an automated milking system.
    Jago JG; Davis KL; Copeman PJ; Woolford MM
    J Dairy Res; 2006 May; 73(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 16476173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of air intake on the concentration of free fatty acids and vacuum fluctuations during automatic milking.
    Rasmussen MD; Wiking L; Bjerring M; Larsen HC
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Dec; 89(12):4596-605. PubMed ID: 17106091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Milk-flow data collected routinely in an automatic milking system: an alternative to milking-time testing in the management of teat-end condition?
    Nørstebø H; Rachah A; Dalen G; Rønningen O; Whist AC; Reksen O
    Acta Vet Scand; 2018 Jan; 60(1):2. PubMed ID: 29325588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.