BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7940464)

  • 1. [The milking machine as a cause of severe agitation in cows (and the farmer) during milking].
    Laevens H; Janssens A; de Kruif A; de Meulemeester L; Vandermeersch R
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1994 Sep; 119(17):495-9. PubMed ID: 7940464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows.
    Holst GE; Adrion F; Umstätter C; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4775-4786. PubMed ID: 33612232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting mouthpiece chamber vacuum in machine milking.
    Borkhus M; Rønningen O
    J Dairy Res; 2003 Aug; 70(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12916822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows.
    Odorčić M; Rasmussen MD; Paulrud CO; Bruckmaier RM
    Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s94-s99. PubMed ID: 31280747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Besier J; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3096-3102. PubMed ID: 26830741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced liner-open phase and vacuum instead of prestimulation increase parlor efficiency in dairy cows.
    Tuor M; Jenni B; Wellnitz O; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):1533-1541. PubMed ID: 34955277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in cow teat tissue created by two types of milking cluster.
    Hillerton JE; Ohnstad I; Baines JR; Leach KA
    J Dairy Res; 2000 Aug; 67(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 11037228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a latency period between pre-stimulation and teat cup attachment and periodic vacuum reduction on milking characteristics and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Vetter A; van Dorland HA; Youssef M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Res; 2014 Feb; 81(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 24433587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
    Stauffer C; Feierabend M; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9250-9260. PubMed ID: 32747105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood perfusion of teat tissue in dairy cows: Changes associated with pre-milking stimulation and machine milking.
    Wieland M; Shirky S; Gioia G; Sipka A; Virkler PD; Nydam DV; Älveby N; Porter IR
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6588-6599. PubMed ID: 32389482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on milkability, milk quality and milking irregularities of crossbred cows.
    Fahim A; Kamboj ML; Sirohi AS; Bhakat M; Mohanty TK
    J Dairy Res; 2019 May; 86(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 31169089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short communication: Effect of vacuum and ratio on the performance of a monoblock silicone milking liner.
    Spencer SB; Shin JW; Rogers GW; Cooper JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Apr; 90(4):1725-8. PubMed ID: 17369212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition.
    Ambord S; Bruckmaier RM
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3588-94. PubMed ID: 20655427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for assessing teatcup liner performance during the peak milk flow period.
    Penry JF; Upton J; Leonardi S; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):649-660. PubMed ID: 29102142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Milking performance and udder health of cows milked with two different liners.
    Rasmussen MD; Frimer ES; Kaartinen L; Jensen NE
    J Dairy Res; 1998 Aug; 65(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 9718489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Premilking teat preparation for Australian pasture-based cows milked by an automated milking system.
    Davis KL; Fulkerson WJ; Garcia SC; Dickeson D; Barchia IM
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2604-9. PubMed ID: 18565919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of milking, over-milking and vacuum levels on front and rear quarter teats in dairy cows.
    Vierbauch T; Peinhopf-Petz W; Wittek T
    J Dairy Res; 2021 Nov; 88(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 34924072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of pre-milking teat-brushing on milk processing time in an automated milking system.
    Jago JG; Davis KL; Copeman PJ; Woolford MM
    J Dairy Res; 2006 May; 73(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 16476173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of air intake on the concentration of free fatty acids and vacuum fluctuations during automatic milking.
    Rasmussen MD; Wiking L; Bjerring M; Larsen HC
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Dec; 89(12):4596-605. PubMed ID: 17106091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Milk-flow data collected routinely in an automatic milking system: an alternative to milking-time testing in the management of teat-end condition?
    Nørstebø H; Rachah A; Dalen G; Rønningen O; Whist AC; Reksen O
    Acta Vet Scand; 2018 Jan; 60(1):2. PubMed ID: 29325588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.