These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7941410)
1. Perceived surface shape not features determines correspondence strength in apparent motion. He ZJ; Nakayama K Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(16):2125-35. PubMed ID: 7941410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues. Shechter S; Hochstein S; Hillman P Vision Res; 1988; 28(9):1013-21. PubMed ID: 3254644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual organization of apparent motion in the Ternus display. He ZJ; Ooi TL Perception; 1999; 28(7):877-92. PubMed ID: 10664779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apparent motion determined by surface layout not by disparity or three-dimensional distance. He ZJ; Nakayama K Nature; 1994 Jan; 367(6459):173-5. PubMed ID: 8114913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Background motion and the perception of shape defined by illusory contours. Li WO; Khuu SK; Hayes A J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):5.1-11. PubMed ID: 19761296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? Green M Vision Res; 1986; 26(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 3739235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of 3D shape in context: contrast and assimilation. van der Kooij K; te Pas SF Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):746-51. PubMed ID: 19385089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of stereopsis, motion parallax, perspective and angle polarity in perceiving 3-D shape. Sherman A; Papathomas TV; Jain A; Keane BP Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(3-4):263-85. PubMed ID: 21771395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereo and motion disparities interfere with positional averaging. Harris JM; Morgan MJ Vision Res; 1993 Feb; 33(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 8447103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Perception of History: Seeing Causal History in Static Shapes Induces Illusory Motion Perception. Chen YC; Scholl BJ Psychol Sci; 2016 Jun; 27(6):923-30. PubMed ID: 27117275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative roles of 3-D and 2-D coordinate systems in solving the correspondence problem in apparent motion. Prins N; Juola JF Vision Res; 2001 Mar; 41(6):759-69. PubMed ID: 11248264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Errors in direction-of-motion discrimination with dichoptically viewed stimuli. Derrington AM; Fine I; Henning GB Vision Res; 1993 Jul; 33(11):1491-4. PubMed ID: 8351821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual mechanisms underlying amodal surface integration of 3-D stereoscopic stimuli. He ZJ; Ooi TL; Su YR Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():66-81. PubMed ID: 29248730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apparent motion can be perceived between patterns with dissimilar spatial frequencies. Baro JA; Levinson E Vision Res; 1988; 28(12):1311-3. PubMed ID: 3256148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amodal representation of occluded surfaces: role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence. Shimojo S; Nakayama K Perception; 1990; 19(3):285-99. PubMed ID: 2267141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast long-distance interactions in the early processing of motion-defined form and of combinations of motion-defined, luminance-defined, and cyclopean form. Kohly RP; Regan D Vision Res; 2002 Apr; 42(8):969-80. PubMed ID: 11934449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of age upon the perception of depth and 3-D shape from differential motion and binocular disparity. Norman JF; Dawson TE; Butler AK Perception; 2000; 29(11):1335-59. PubMed ID: 11219988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]