These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7941420)

  • 1. Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues.
    Johnston EB; Cumming BG; Landy MS
    Vision Res; 1994 Sep; 34(17):2259-75. PubMed ID: 7941420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.
    Jain A; Zaidi Q
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 23325345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The intrinsic constraint model for stereo-motion integration.
    Tassinari H; Domini F
    Perception; 2008; 37(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 18399249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of stereopsis, motion parallax, perspective and angle polarity in perceiving 3-D shape.
    Sherman A; Papathomas TV; Jain A; Keane BP
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(3-4):263-85. PubMed ID: 21771395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No evidence for sequential effects of the interaction of stereo and motion cues in judgements of perceived shape.
    Champion RA; Brenner E; Mamassian P; Simmons DR
    Vision Res; 2004 Mar; 44(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 14680774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isotropic integration of binocular disparity and relative motion in the perception of three-dimensional shape.
    Hibbard PB; Bradshaw MF
    Spat Vis; 2002; 15(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 11991575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of 3D shape in context: contrast and assimilation.
    van der Kooij K; te Pas SF
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):746-51. PubMed ID: 19385089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stereo and motion parallax cues in human 3D vision: can they vanish without a trace?
    Rauschecker AM; Solomon SG; Glennerster A
    J Vis; 2006 Dec; 6(12):1471-85. PubMed ID: 17209749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information.
    Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Glennerster A
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(27):3725-34. PubMed ID: 11090665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Large scale stereopsis and optic flow: depth enhanced by speed and opponent-motion.
    Ziegler LR; Roy JP
    Vision Res; 1998 May; 38(9):1199-209. PubMed ID: 9666988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abnormal depth perception from motion parallax in amblyopic observers.
    Thompson AM; Nawrot M
    Vision Res; 1999 Apr; 39(7):1407-13. PubMed ID: 10343851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in the computation of depth.
    Bradshaw MF; Rogers BJ
    Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(21):3457-68. PubMed ID: 8977012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy.
    Scarfe P; Hibbard PB
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1599-610. PubMed ID: 16364392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception.
    Trueswell JC; Hayhoe MM
    Vision Res; 1993 Feb; 33(3):313-28. PubMed ID: 8447104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cue conflict between disparity change and looming in the perception of motion in depth.
    González EG; Allison RS; Ono H; Vinnikov M
    Vision Res; 2010 Jan; 50(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 19909770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactions between cues to visual motion in depth.
    Howard IP; Fujii Y; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24554479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereopsis with persisting and dynamic textures.
    Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(28):3823-7. PubMed ID: 11090674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What limits the contribution of second-order motion to the perception of surface shape?
    Hess RF; Ziegler LR
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(16):2125-33. PubMed ID: 10878274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seeing stereoscopic depth from disparity between kinetic edges.
    Poom L
    Perception; 2002; 31(12):1439-48. PubMed ID: 12916668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dichoptic motion perception limited to depth of fixation?
    Lages M; Dolia A; Graf EW
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 17112562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.