These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7943933)

  • 1. Quantitative coronary arteriography and its assessment of atherosclerosis. Part I. Examining the independent variables.
    Fleming RM; Harrington GM; Gibbs HR; Swafford J
    Angiology; 1994 Oct; 45(10):829-33. PubMed ID: 7943933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative coronary arteriography and its assessment of atherosclerosis. Part II. Calculating stenosis flow reserve from percent diameter stenosis.
    Fleming RM; Harrington GM
    Angiology; 1994 Oct; 45(10):835-40. PubMed ID: 7943934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two and three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
    Kan J; Gao X; Sandeep KG; Xu H; Zhao Y; Chen S; Chen F
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 24622427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
    Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
    Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation by high-frequency epicardial echocardiography of a new method of analyzing coronary angiography quantitatively in coronary artery disease.
    McPherson DD; Johnson MR; Collins SM; Kieso RA; Marcus ML; Kerber RE
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Jan; 71(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8420232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Threshold parameters of left main coronary artery stem stenosis based on intracoronary ultrasound examination.
    Gil RJ; Gziut AI; Prati F; Witkowski A; Kubica J
    Kardiol Pol; 2005 Sep; 63(3):223-31; discussion 232-3. PubMed ID: 16180175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?
    Rossi A; Papadopoulou SL; Pugliese F; Russo B; Dharampal AS; Dedic A; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Meijboom WB; van Geuns RJ; Wragg A; Ligthart J; Schultz C; Petersen SE; Nieman K; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24280729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Serial quantitative coronary angiography and coronary events.
    Mack WJ; Xiang M; Selzer RH; Hodis HN
    Am Heart J; 2000 Jun; 139(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 10827379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Poiseuille-based coronary angiographic index for prediction of fractional flow reserve.
    Jaffe R; Halon DA; Roguin A; Rubinshtein R; Lewis BS
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Aug; 167(3):862-5. PubMed ID: 22360946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease progression.
    Berry C; L'Allier PL; Grégoire J; Lespérance J; Levesque S; Ibrahim R; Tardif JC
    Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(14):1851-7. PubMed ID: 17389269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.
    Dewey M; Rutsch W; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Hamm B
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advanced three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: methodology and phantom validation.
    Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Muramatsu T; Aben JP; Onuma Y; Soekhradj S; Morel MA; van Geuns RJ; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Apr; 8(12):1451-60. PubMed ID: 23680960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of coronary atherosclerosis by multislice computed tomography in patients with acute myocardial infarction and without significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Aldrovandi A; Cademartiri F; Menozzi A; Ugo F; Lina D; Maffei E; Palumbo A; Fusaro M; Crisi G; Ardissino D
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Nov; 1(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 19808544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
    Muramatsu T; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Nakatani S; Girasis C; Campos CM; Morel MA; Jonker H; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; García-García HM; Leon MB; Serruys PW; Onuma Y;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic models for bifurcation segmental analysis: in vitro validation of CAAS against precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms.
    Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Boersma E; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 May; 77(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20939040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.
    Meijboom WB; Van Mieghem CA; van Pelt N; Weustink A; Pugliese F; Mollet NR; Boersma E; Regar E; van Geuns RJ; de Jaegere PJ; Serruys PW; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 52(8):636-43. PubMed ID: 18702967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
    Porto I; Dato I; Todaro D; Calabrese M; Rigattieri S; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Crea F
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomic features of the left main coronary artery and factors associated with its bifurcation angle: a 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic study.
    Rubinshtein R; Lerman A; Spoon DB; Rihal CS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 80(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 22121105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.