These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7943934)

  • 41. Plaque volume derived from three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography predicts the fractional flow reserve.
    Kolozsvári R; Tar B; Lugosi P; Sánta J; Béres Z; Ungvári T; Polgár P; Kőszegi Z
    Int J Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 160(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 21543127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.
    Tonino PA; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Oldroyd KG; Leesar MA; Ver Lee PN; Maccarthy PA; Van't Veer M; Pijls NH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 55(25):2816-21. PubMed ID: 20579537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reduced coronary flow reserve in the coronary sinus is a predictor of hemodynamically significant stenoses of the left coronary artery territory.
    Vrublevsky AV; Boshchenko AA; Karpov RS
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2004 Aug; 5(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 15219544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Pyxaras SA; Tu S; Barbato E; Barbati G; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Mangiacapra F; Sinagra G; De Bruyne B; Reiber JH; Wijns W
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1010-1018.e1. PubMed ID: 24268215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for detection of stenoses in the left coronary artery by use of poststenotic coronary flow profiles: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and coronary flow reserve.
    Holte E; Vegsundvåg J; Hegbom K; Hole T; Wiseth R
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Jan; 26(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling Using Coronary Angiographic Vessel Morphology Versus Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Tröbs M; Achenbach S; Röther J; Redel T; Scheuering M; Winneberger D; Klingenbeck K; Itu L; Passerini T; Kamen A; Sharma P; Comaniciu D; Schlundt C
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 117(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 26596195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative evaluation of coronary stenoses using fluid dynamic equations and standard quantitative coronary arteriography.
    Kimball BP; Dafopoulos N; LiPreti V
    Am J Cardiol; 1989 Jul; 64(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 2741813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Advances in two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: improved small lumen diameter detection and automatic reference vessel diameter derivation.
    Girasis C; Schuurbiers JC; Onuma Y; Aben JP; Weijers B; Morel MA; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Mar; 7(11):1326-35. PubMed ID: 22433196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [A comparative study of target vessel assessments by three- and two-dimensional quantitative coronary X-ray angiography and visual estimation].
    Hao PY; Chen AH; Song XD; Wei XL; Zhou SS; He F; Tu SX
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Feb; 31(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 21354924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accuracy of quantification of coronary arteriograms with hand-held calipers. A validation study.
    Atar D; Saunamäki K
    Cardiology; 1994; 85(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 7954569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Natural history of coronary atherosclerosis using quantitative angiography in men, and implications for clinical trials of coronary regression. The Harvard Atherosclerosis Reversibility Project Study Group.
    Stone PH; Gibson CM; Pasternak RC; McManus K; Diaz L; Boucher T; Spears R; Sandor T; Rosner B; Sacks FM
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 71(10):766-72. PubMed ID: 8456751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evolution of coronary stenoses is related to baseline severity--a prospective quantitative angiographic analysis in patients with moderate coronary disease. INTACT Investigators. International Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy.
    Jost S; Deckers JW; Nikutta P; Wiese B; Rafflenbeul W; Hecker H; Lippolt P; Lichtlen PR
    Eur Heart J; 1994 May; 15(5):648-53. PubMed ID: 8056005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improved stenosis geometry by quantitative coronary arteriography after vigorous risk factor modification.
    Gould KL; Ornish D; Kirkeeide R; Brown S; Stuart Y; Buchi M; Billings J; Armstrong W; Ports T; Scherwitz L
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Apr; 69(9):845-53. PubMed ID: 1550011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical value of digital radiographic coronary quantification: comparison with visual assessment and coronary flow reserve.
    Legrand V; Mancini GB; Le Free MT; Vogel RA
    Eur Heart J; 1992 Jan; 13(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 1577040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Digital subtraction angiographic imaging of coronary flow reserve.
    Cusma JT; Toggart EJ; Folts JD; Peppler WW; Hangiandreou NJ; Lee CS; Mistretta CA
    Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):461-72. PubMed ID: 3802449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital densitometric determination of relative coronary flow distributions.
    Csizmadia NP; Slump CH; Lubbers AP; Schrijver M; Storm CJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2001 May; 39(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 11465884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method.
    Mancini GB; Simon SB; McGillem MJ; LeFree MT; Friedman HZ; Vogel RA
    Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):452-60. PubMed ID: 3802448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use.
    Gurley JC; Nissen SE; Booth DC; DeMaria AN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 May; 19(6):1237-43. PubMed ID: 1564224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of computer- and human-derived coronary angiographic end-point measures for controlled therapy trials.
    Mack WJ; Selzer RH; Pogoda JM; Lee PL; Shircore AM; Azen SP; Blankenhorn DH
    Arterioscler Thromb; 1992 Mar; 12(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 1547194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.