These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7943982)

  • 1. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members.
    Jamieson A
    Anim Genet; 1994 Jun; 25 Suppl 1():37-44. PubMed ID: 7943982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.
    Jamieson A; Taylor SC
    Anim Genet; 1997 Dec; 28(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 9616104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paternity evaluation in cases lacking a mother and nondetectable alleles.
    Chakraborty R; Jin L; Zhong Y
    Int J Legal Med; 1994; 107(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 7893609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of sibship in any two persons.
    Wenk RE; Traver M; Chiafari FA
    Transfusion; 1996 Mar; 36(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 8604513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hypervariable polymorphic VNTR loci for parentage testing and individual identification.
    Yokoi T; Nata M; Odaira T; Sagisaka K
    Jinrui Idengaku Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 35(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 2398633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Aug; 99(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 17487215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [How to draw a conclusion in motherless parentage testing using short tandem repeats as genetic makers].
    Zhu YL; Huang YM; Wu XY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 22(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 17080668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity.
    Chakraborty R; Meagher TR; Smouse PE
    Genetics; 1988 Mar; 118(3):527-36. PubMed ID: 3163316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Formula Derivation and Validation of Probability of Exclusion in the Cases of Standard Triplet Parentage Testing].
    Zhou M; Zhang HQ; Wang J
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 33(4):363-367. PubMed ID: 29219265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinguishing full siblings from half-siblings in limited pedigrees.
    Wenk RE; Chiafari FA
    Transfusion; 2000 Jan; 40(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 10644810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microsatellite polymorphism in closely related dogs.
    Altet L; Francino O; Sánchez A
    J Hered; 2001; 92(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 11447246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Canine parentage testing based on microsatellite polymorphisms.
    Ichikawa Y; Takagi K; Tsumagari S; Ishihama K; Morita M; Kanemaki M; Takeishi M; Takahashi H
    J Vet Med Sci; 2001 Nov; 63(11):1209-13. PubMed ID: 11767055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sib-parentage testing using molecular markers when parents are unknown.
    García D; Carleos C; Parra D; Cañón J
    Anim Genet; 2002 Oct; 33(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 12354145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paternity analysis in cases of father-daughter incest using multiallelic loci.
    Cifuentes O L; Jorquera G H
    Hum Hered; 1997; 47(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 9358018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Difficulties in parentage analysis: the probability that an offspring and parent have the same heterozygous genotype.
    Fiumera AC; Asmussen MA
    Genet Res; 2001 Oct; 78(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 11732093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deterministic paternity exclusion using RAPD markers.
    Lewis PO; Snow AA
    Mol Ecol; 1992 Oct; 1(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 1344991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
    Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Investigation of algorithm for the calculation of probability of paternity likelihood using personal computer program, including the application to parentage testing in the decreased party].
    Akane A; Matsubara K; Shiono H
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1992 Aug; 46(4):254-65. PubMed ID: 1405018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedigree likelihood formulae based on founder and founder couple symmetry and validation of DNA testing software.
    Yang D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102782. PubMed ID: 36279724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.