BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7944253)

  • 1. Racial differences in fetal morphometry in Singapore.
    Yeo GS; Chan WB; Lun KC; Lai FM
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1994 May; 23(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 7944253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
    Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
    L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
    Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. A comparison by race and sex.
    Davis RO; Cutter GR; Goldenberg RL; Hoffman HJ; Cliver SP; Brumfield CG
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 8487238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between fetal femur diaphysis length and neonatal crown-heel length: the effect of race.
    Lim JM; Hong AG; Raman S; Shyamala N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 10775996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
    Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Wright D; Wright A; Smith E; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 31682299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nomograms of the axial fetal cerebellar hemisphere circumference and area throughout gestation.
    Sherer DM; Sokolovski M; Dalloul M; Pezzullo JC; Osho JA; Abulafia O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 29(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 17171631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ratios between the abdominal circumference, head circumference, or femur length and the transverse cerebellar diameter of the growth-retarded and macrosomic fetus.
    Hill LM; Guzick D; DiNofrio D; Maloney J; Merolillo C; Nedzesky P
    Am J Perinatol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 8198657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.
    Nasrat H; Bondagji NS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Feb; 88(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15694104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of fetal biparietal diameter measurements between local Chinese and Caucasian populations.
    Chan WB; Yeo GS
    Singapore Med J; 1991 Aug; 32(4):214-7. PubMed ID: 1775995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femur-sparing pattern of abnormal fetal growth in pregnant women from New York City after maternal Zika virus infection.
    Walker CL; Merriam AA; Ohuma EO; Dighe MK; Gale M; Rajagopal L; Papageorghiou AT; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Adams Waldorf KM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):187.e1-187.e20. PubMed ID: 29738748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal fetal biometry of normal pregnant Melanesian Papua New Guineans to construct standards of reference for Papua New Guinea.
    Amoa AB; Wapi J; Klufio CA
    P N G Med J; 1993 Sep; 36(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 8059548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. References intervals for fetal biometrical parameters.
    Figueras F; Torrents M; Muñoz A; Comas C; Antolín E; Echevarría M; Mallafré J; Carrera JM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2002 Oct; 105(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12270560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
    Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
    J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body proportionality of the small-for-date fetus: is it related to aetiological factors?
    Todros T; Plazzotta C; Pastorin L
    Early Hum Dev; 1996 Jul; 45(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 8842635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry.
    Peixoto-Filho FM; de Sá RA; Velarde LG; de Castro Mocarzel C; Lopes LM; Ville Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22899306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
    Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
    Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal growth velocity standards from the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21
    Ohuma EO; Villar J; Feng Y; Xiao L; Salomon L; Barros FC; Cheikh Ismail L; Stones W; Jaffer Y; Oberto M; Noble JA; Gravett MG; Wu Q; Victora CG; Lambert A; Di Nicola P; Purwar M; Bhutta ZA; Kennedy SH; Papageorghiou AT;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):208.e1-208.e18. PubMed ID: 32768431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.