These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7947580)

  • 1. Extracranial versus intracranial references in individual cephalometric analysis.
    Ozbek MM; Köklü A
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 21(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 7947580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Natural cervical inclination and craniofacial structure.
    Ozbek MM; Köklü A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Dec; 104(6):584-91. PubMed ID: 8249934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
    Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prenatal assessment of the antero-posterior jaw relationship in human fetuses: from anatomical to ultrasound cephalometric analysis.
    Captier G; Faure JM; Bäumler M; Canovas F; Demattei C; Daures JP
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 20815708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of cephalometric appraisal of the inheritance of craniofacial pattern in Gorkhas.
    Mehta OP; Gupta DS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 18923224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
    Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of variation of sagittal position of the jaw bones in skeletal Class III malocclusion].
    Stojanović Z; Nikolić P; Nikodijević A; Milić J; Duka M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Dec; 69(12):1039-45. PubMed ID: 23424956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
    Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric superimpositions.
    Gu Y; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):967-76. PubMed ID: 18947269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Natural head position, posture, and prognathism: the Chapman Prize Essay, 1986.
    Cole SC
    Br J Orthod; 1988 Nov; 15(4):227-39. PubMed ID: 3203098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods.
    Albarakati SF; Kula KS; Ghoneima AA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22184624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric norms for Bunt and Brahmin children of Dakshina Kannada based on McNamara's analysis.
    Bhat M; Sudha P; Tandon S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Jun; 19(2):41-51. PubMed ID: 11692821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-dependant cephalometric standards as determined by multilevel modeling.
    van Diepenbeek AF; Buschang PH; Prahl-Andersen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 19121505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial form in class III cases.
    Mackay F; Jones JA; Thompson R; Simpson W
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 19(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 1562574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric analysis of adults with Turner syndrome.
    Svanberg C; Norevall LI; Ekman B; Wahlberg J; Bågesund M
    Swed Dent J; 2016; 40(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 27464380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cephalometric analysis of the cranial base and frontal part of the face in patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Cutović T; Jović N; Stojanović L; Radojicić J; Mladenović I; Matijević S; Kozomara R
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jun; 71(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 25039106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative cephalometric analysis in patients with X-chromosome aneuploidy.
    Babić M; Sćepan I; Mićić M
    Arch Oral Biol; 1993 Feb; 38(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 8476348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geometric influence of the sagittal and vertical apical base relationship on the ANB angle.
    Sadat-Khonsari R; Dathe H; Knösel M; Hahn W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Bauss O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 19322533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.