BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 79476)

  • 1. The effect of experimental 'scotomata' on the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to pattern-reversal in one half-field.
    Blumhardt LD; Barrett G; Halliday AM; Kriss A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1978 Sep; 45(3):376-92. PubMed ID: 79476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemisphere contributions to the composition of the pattern-evoked potential waveform.
    Blumenhardt LD; Halliday AM
    Exp Brain Res; 1979 Jun; 36(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 467535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of experimental scotomata on sequential pattern-onset, pattern-reversal and pattern-offset visual evoked potentials.
    Shawkat FS; Kriss A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 94(4):307-20. PubMed ID: 9858091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of central scotomata on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in patients with maculopathy and healthy subjects.
    Fukui R; Kato M; Kuroiwa Y
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Apr; 63(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 2419089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial distribution of potentials evoked by half-field pattern-reversal and pattern-onset stimuli.
    Shagass C; Amadeo M; Roemer RA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1976 Dec; 41(6):609-22. PubMed ID: 62655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pattern evoked potentials in human albinism. Evidence of two different topographical asymmetries reflecting abnormal retino-cortical projections.
    Carroll WM; Jay BS; McDonald WI; Halliday AM
    J Neurol Sci; 1980 Nov; 48(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 7431042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric differences for visual evoked potentials from checkerboard stimuli.
    Pike J; Polich J
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(6):947-52. PubMed ID: 3194058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects.
    Blumhardt LD; Barrett G; Halliday AM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jul; 61(7):454-61. PubMed ID: 889758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Sequential spatial maps of visual potentials evoked by checkerboard-pattern reversal: effect of the retinal field stimulated on response topography].
    Mauguière F; Giard MH; Ibañez V; Pernier J
    Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin; 1985 Sep; 15(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 4070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual evoked cortical magnetic responses to checkerboard pattern reversal stimulation: a study on the neural generators of N75, P100 and N145.
    Shigeto H; Tobimatsu S; Yamamoto T; Kobayashi T; Kato M
    J Neurol Sci; 1998 Apr; 156(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 9588856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frontal negativity of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials in humans.
    Kurita-Tashima S; Tobimatsu S; Kato M
    Neurosci Res; 1991 Feb; 10(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 1851977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in fencers.
    Taddei F; Viggiano MP; Mecacci L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1991 Dec; 11(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 1797759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissociation of frontal N100 from occipital P100 in pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.
    Spitz MC; Emerson RG; Pedley TA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 2420568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The polarity inversion of scalp potentials evoked by upper and lower half-field stimulus patterns: latency or surface distribution differences?
    Jeffreys DA; Smith AT
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Apr; 46(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 85537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
    Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
    Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of adaptation to the stimulating pattern on the latency and wave form of visual evoked potentials.
    Ochs AL; Aminoff MJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 48(5):502-8. PubMed ID: 6153958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different scalp localization of pattern onset and reversal visual evoked potentials.
    Biersdorf WR
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1987 Aug; 66(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 3428085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generators of visual evoked potentials investigated by dipole tracing in the human occipital cortex.
    Ikeda H; Nishijo H; Miyamoto K; Tamura R; Endo S; Ono T
    Neuroscience; 1998 Jun; 84(3):723-39. PubMed ID: 9579779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of cerebral lateralization of function using EEG alpha-contingent visual stimulation II.
    Goodman D; Mulholland T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1988 Nov; 6(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 3225202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of visual field size on hemispheric asymmetry of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials.
    Mecacci L; Spinelli D; Viggiano MP
    Int J Neurosci; 1990 Mar; 51(1-2):141-51. PubMed ID: 2265903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.