These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7948334)

  • 1. Evaluation of the New South Wales Cancer Council Pap Test Reminder Service.
    Mills AE; Simpson JM; Shelley JM; Turnbull DA
    Aust J Public Health; 1994 Jun; 18(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 7948334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under-screened women in NSW?
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Zeckendorf S; Niciak A; Wain G; Ross J
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 29(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 15782877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pap smear usage in New South Wales--impact of active promotion.
    Young M; Trevan E
    Community Health Stud; 1990; 14(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 2253460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.
    Bowles EJ; Gao H; Brandzel S; Bradford SC; Buist DS
    Prev Med; 2016 May; 86():19-27. PubMed ID: 26820221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pap smear screening at an urban aboriginal health service: report of a practice audit and an evaluation of recruitment strategies.
    Hunt JM; Gless GL; Straton JA
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1998 Oct; 22(6):720-5. PubMed ID: 9848971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
    Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
    Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptability of reminder letters for Papanicolaou tests: a survey of women from 23 Family Health Networks in Ontario.
    Karwalajtys T; Kaczorowski J; Lohfeld L; Laryea S; Anderson K; Roder S; Sebaldt RJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2007 Oct; 29(10):829-34. PubMed ID: 17915066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early cervical cancer rescreening.
    Morrell S; Mamoon H; O'Callaghan J; Taylor R; Ross J; Wain G
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11943794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Buehler SK; Parsons WL
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cancer screening for hospital inpatients: report of an intervention study.
    Straton JA; Sutherland GJ; Hyndman JC
    Aust J Public Health; 1995 Jun; 19(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 7542929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Who has Pap smears in New South Wales? Patterns of screening across sociodemographic groups.
    Shelley JM; Irwig LM; Simpson JM; Macaskill P
    Aust J Public Health; 1994 Dec; 18(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 7718654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How reminders given to patients and physicians affected pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; McBride S; Moncrease A; Simon MS; Dews P; Coombs J
    Cancer; 1998 Jun; 82(12):2391-400. PubMed ID: 9635532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
    Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Have the most recent Pap smear guidelines affected GP practices?
    Wai D; Ferrier A; Collings S; Laverty C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S44-8. PubMed ID: 9479800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mass mailing campaigns to promote screening for cervical cancer: do they work, and do they continue to work?
    Byles JE; Sanson-Fisher RW
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1996 Jun; 20(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 8768414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of patient reminder letters to promote cancer screening services in women: A population-based study in Wisconsin.
    Reeves MJ; Remington PL
    Prev Med; 1999 Sep; 29(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 10479608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the phone call the most effective method for recall in cervical cancer screening?--results from a randomised control trial.
    Abdul Rashid RM; Mohamed M; Hamid ZA; Dahlui M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5901-4. PubMed ID: 24289597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of Pap test history and histologically determined cervical cancer in NSW women, 1997-2003.
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Wain G
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 16417696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can an appointment-letter intervention increase pap smear screening in Samliem, Khon Kaen, Thailand?
    Chumworathayi B; Yuenyao P; Luanratanakorn S; Pattamadilok J; Chalapati W; Na-Nhongkai C
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 18159966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond opportunistic Pap smears in general practice. Women's views of strategies to promote regular screening.
    Ward J; D'Este C; Sanson-Fisher R
    Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Nov; 22(11):2032-4. PubMed ID: 8304859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.