These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7948653)

  • 21. [Correlation between auditory threshold and transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Komazec Z; Milosević D; Mocko M; Dankuc D; Vlaski L
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2002; 130 Suppl 1():8-11. PubMed ID: 12395455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors.
    De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Time-frequency domain filtering of evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Moleti A; Longo F; Sisto R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2455-67. PubMed ID: 23039440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and efferent control of cochlea].
    Xu J; Liu C; Guo L; Lian N; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 12761959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Otoacoustic emission and auditory efferent function testing in normal subjects and patients with sensori-neural hearing loss].
    Liang F; Liu C; Liu B
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Oct; 76(10):763-6. PubMed ID: 9275520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of the matching pursuit algorithm with a dictionary of asymmetric waveforms in the analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kwaskiewicz K; Blinowska KJ; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3137-46. PubMed ID: 20000927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cochlear reflectivity in transmission-line models and otoacoustic emission characteristic time delays.
    Sisto R; Moleti A; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3554-61. PubMed ID: 18247763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal suppression of the click-evoked otoacoustic emission level-curve.
    Verhulst S; Harte JM; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1452-63. PubMed ID: 21428509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.
    Prieve BA; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 May; 99(5):3077-86. PubMed ID: 8642118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in adult subjects: standard indices and test-retest reliability.
    Vedantam R; Musiek FE
    Am J Otol; 1991 Nov; 12(6):435-42. PubMed ID: 1805634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Otoacoustic emissions and quinine sulfate.
    McFadden D; Pasanen EG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3460-74. PubMed ID: 8046138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High-resolution analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    McNamara DM; Goli A; Ziarani AK
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1898-902. PubMed ID: 19163060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission generators in a nonlinear cochlea.
    Moleti A; Botti T; Sisto R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2891-903. PubMed ID: 22501067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High resolution system for improved transient-evoked otoacoustic emission acquisition.
    Bennett CL; Ozdamar O
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6263-6. PubMed ID: 19963668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Effect of sedation on otoacoustic emissions].
    Delb W; Merl E; Andes C; Koch A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jun; 73(6):315-9. PubMed ID: 8060450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time-frequency decomposition of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Mishra SK; Biswal M
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():161-178. PubMed ID: 26976693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of noise bandwidth on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Velenovsky DS; Glattke TJ
    Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 164(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 11950523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):499. PubMed ID: 28147608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Effect of Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Level on the Strength and Detectability of the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lewis JD
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1391-1403. PubMed ID: 30896525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adaptive filter based two-probe noise suppression system for transient evoked otoacoustic emission detection.
    Subotić M; Šarić Z; Jovičić ST
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 40(3):637-47. PubMed ID: 22009312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.