These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7948653)

  • 41. Data preparation for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Pascher-Mankiewicz B; Gall V
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1996; 48(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 8823987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Time-frequency analysis of transient evoked-otoacoustic emissions in individuals with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Narne VK; Prabhu PP; Chatni S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jul; 313():1-8. PubMed ID: 24768764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Tognola G; Grandori F; Ravazzani P
    Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):112-22. PubMed ID: 9112111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Noise suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. A comparison with the non-linear method.
    Molenaar DG; Shaw G; Eggermont JJ
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):197-207. PubMed ID: 10771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Analyzing transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions by concentration of frequency and time.
    Wu HT; Liu YW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):448. PubMed ID: 30075682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [A case report of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions].
    Paaske PB; Møller K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Oct; 151(42):2735-6. PubMed ID: 2815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Yates GK; Withnell RH
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):49-64. PubMed ID: 10511624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Changes to low-frequency components of the TEOAE following acoustic trauma to the base of the cochlea.
    Withnell RH; Yates GK; Kirk DL
    Hear Res; 2000 Jan; 139(1-2):1-12. PubMed ID: 10601708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Electrical recording of otoacoustic emission.
    Takeda T; Kakigi A; Takeda S; Nakatani H; Takebayashi S; Ohono S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010; 71 Suppl 1():30-40. PubMed ID: 20185948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli.
    Keefe DH; Patrick Feeney M; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF; Sanford CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):399. PubMed ID: 29390789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Synthesis and decomposition of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions based on an active auditory model.
    Zheng L; Zhang YT; Yang FS; Ye DT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Sep; 46(9):1098-106. PubMed ID: 10493073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1949. PubMed ID: 27914441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Modification of the wavelet method used in transiently evoked otoacoustic emission pass/fail criterion to increase its accuracy.
    Yang LP; Young ST; Ku TS
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2002 Jan; 40(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 11954706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A new analysis method for the evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Rahko T; Kumpulainen P; Ihalainen H; Ojala E; Aumala O
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1997; 529():66-8. PubMed ID: 9288271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of age on click-evoked otoacoustic emission: A systematic review.
    Liu J; Wang N
    Neural Regen Res; 2012 Apr; 7(11):853-61. PubMed ID: 25737714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of exam procedures on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in neonates.
    Vohr BR; White KR; Maxon AB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Apr; 7(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 8652872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reliability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Marshall L; Heller LM
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):237-54. PubMed ID: 8807266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical applicability of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: identification and classification of hearing loss.
    Hatzopoulos S; Prosser S; Mazzoli M; Rosignoli M; Martini A
    Audiol Neurootol; 1998; 3(6):402-18. PubMed ID: 9732133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Lack of association between transiently evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude and experimentation linked-factors (repeated acoustic stimulation, cerebrospinal fluid pressure, supine and sitting positions, alertness level).
    Froehlich P; Ferber C; Remond J; Jaboulay JM; Morgon A; Duclaux R; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):184-90. PubMed ID: 8071145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications and technical considerations.
    Abdo MH; Feghali JG; Stapells DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1993 Jan; 25(1-3):61-71. PubMed ID: 8436481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.