These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7949413)
61. Civil commitment in Turkey: reflections on a bill drafted by psychiatrists. Arikan R; Appelbaum PS; Sercan M; Turkcan S; Satmis N; Polat A Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16844221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The right to refuse treatment: four case studies of legal mobilization. Milner N Law Soc Rev; 1987; 21(3):447-85. PubMed ID: 11658909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Management of forensic psychiatry patients who refuse medication--two scenarios. Rodenhauser P; Heller A J Forensic Sci; 1984 Jan; 29(1):237-44. PubMed ID: 6699594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The influence of the right to refuse treatment on precommitment patients. Bloom JD; Williams MH; Godard SL; Faulkner LR Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 3365480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The case of Tim Crawford: mental health legislation five years later. Page S Leg Med Q; 1978 Mar; 2(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 10249100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. [Compulsory commitment to a psychiatric hospital--the status in Austria]. Haberfellner EM; Rittmannsberger H Psychiatr Prax; 1996 May; 23(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 8711005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Consent and capacity: principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Fullbrook S Br J Nurs; 2007 Apr 12-25; 16(7):412-3. PubMed ID: 17505364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Incompetence to refuse treatment: a necessary condition for civil commitment. Lebegue B; Clark LD Am J Psychiatry; 1981 Aug; 138(8):1075-7. PubMed ID: 7258384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Law and the delivery of involuntary mental health services. La Fond JQ Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1994 Apr; 64(2):209-22. PubMed ID: 8037230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Working in the "cuckoo's nest": an essay on recent changes in mental health law and the changing role of psychiatrists in relation to patient and society. Arons BS Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1977; 9(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11664909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Legal aspects of psychiatry in the Soviet Union. Babayan EA Psychiatr Ann; 1978 Jan; 8(1):37/78+. PubMed ID: 11662651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Commentary: the implications of who decides on involuntary treatment. Elizur A Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 11201928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Judicially-ordered involuntary treatment of the mentally ill. Sullivan JL J Mo Bar; 1975 Jun; 31():254-8. PubMed ID: 11664534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada. Winick BJ N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant. Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Is it legal to be crazy: an ethical dilemma. Balevre P Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2001 Oct; 15(5):241-4. PubMed ID: 11584353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. What medical school did you graduate from? Judicial prescribing of medical treatments. Miller RD J Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(2):215-33. PubMed ID: 12546011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [What is the impact of the dispositions of July 5, 2011 on care, 2 years after?]. Vacheron MN Encephale; 2014 Apr; 40(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 24060379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]