These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 794975)

  • 1. [Mandibular pre-impressions without impression trays].
    Klein P
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1976; 5(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 794975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Technology of total impression using the triple mixture process].
    Bugugnani R
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1976; 5(5):398-405. PubMed ID: 794976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the mandibular dental arch in Baghdad patients.
    Hassan AK; Najim ZN
    East Mediterr Health J; 2000; 6(5-6):993-6. PubMed ID: 12197359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impression success using the dual arch technique.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):396-7. PubMed ID: 16366044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pressure generated on a simulated mandibular oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different design.
    Al-Ahmad A; Masri R; Driscoll CF; von Fraunhofer J; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 16650009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Precise mucostatic primary impression taking in the edentulous mandible. Hemi-arch method].
    Landé A
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1991 Mar; 45(173):93-9. PubMed ID: 1853750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Dimensional variations of the mandible in the course of movement. Periodontal and prosthetic consequences].
    Mailland M
    Inf Dent; 1978 Jun; 60(24):19-31. PubMed ID: 361556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Lower pre-impressions without impression trays].
    Klein P
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1977 May; 46(5):62-9. PubMed ID: 351786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional impression and jaw registration: a single session procedure for the construction of complete dentures.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Kettner N; Reppert G; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):554-61. PubMed ID: 15189312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 19418862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.