These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one-stage technique. Abuasi HA; Wassell RW Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 7920403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. Caputi S; Varvara G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Revisiting impressions using dual-arch trays. Small BW Gen Dent; 2012; 60(5):379-81. PubMed ID: 23032223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparative metric study of the edentulous dental arch in black Africans and white Europeans]. Koffi NJ; Koffi KG; Assi KD; Giumelli B Odontostomatol Trop; 2004 Mar; 27(105):29-31. PubMed ID: 15282872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials. Barghi N; Ontiveros JC Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Individual trays for functional impressions of the maxilla]. Sandalis PN Trib Odontol (B Aires); 1978; 62(1-3):47-9. PubMed ID: 369072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Complete impressions with thiokol elastomers using customized chambered impression trays in fixed dentures]. Dumont A J Dent Que; 1984 Jan; 21():47-53. PubMed ID: 6379005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The curve of Spee. Mew J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):3; author reply 3-4. PubMed ID: 19121482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique. Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations. Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Obtaining functional impressions by means of silicone and quasi-individual trays]. Slankamenac S; Beganović M Stomatol Vjesn; 1970; 4(1-4):19-22. PubMed ID: 4951122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Individual trays for impressions using elastomers]. Wirz J; Castagnola L; Garberoglio U Riv Odontoiatr Amici Brugg; 1982; 1(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 6761613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of adding impression material to mandibular denture space in Piezography. Ikebe K; Okuno I; Nokubi T J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 16671986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays. Hansson O; Eklund J Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 6377548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression]. Biffar R; Bittner B Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Methods for replication of the mandible]. Osaka N; Ogi K; Tsujikawa H; Kawamoto T; Ichinose I; Goto H Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1986; 15(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 3524716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]