These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The uses and limitations of the fetal biophysical profile. Oyelese Y; Vintzileos AM Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):47-64, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21353089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antenatal Surveillance in Twin Pregnancies Using the Biophysical Profile. Booker W; Fox NS; Gupta S; Carroll R; Saltzman DH; Klauser CK; Rebarber A J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2071-5. PubMed ID: 26453124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of sonography in the evaluation of the high-risk pregnancy. Manning FA Radiol Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 28(1):205-16. PubMed ID: 2404302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK; Dorchester W Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 8041536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decreased fetal movement with abnormal nonstress test preceding fetal death. Golde SH J Perinatol; 1993; 13(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 8515316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A kick from within--fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. Frøen JF J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 15008381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]