BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950032)

  • 1. Development and evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Management Protocol (CAMP): improved compliance with care guidelines for diabetes mellitus.
    Lobach DF; Hammond WE
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():787-91. PubMed ID: 7950032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer-generated reminder system improves physician compliance with diabetes preventive care guidelines.
    Nilasena DS; Lincoln MJ
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1995; ():640-5. PubMed ID: 8563365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards.
    Lobach DF; Hammond WE
    Am J Med; 1997 Jan; 102(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 9209205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronically distributed, computer-generated, individualized feedback enhances the use of a computerized practice guideline.
    Lobach DF
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():493-7. PubMed ID: 8947715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices.
    Crosson JC; Ohman-Strickland PA; Hahn KA; DiCicco-Bloom B; Shaw E; Orzano AJ; Crabtree BF
    Ann Fam Med; 2007; 5(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 17548848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Foy JM; Earls MF
    Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):e97-104. PubMed ID: 15629972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A population-based approach to diabetes management in a primary care setting: early results and lessons learned.
    McCulloch DK; Price MJ; Hindmarsh M; Wagner EH
    Eff Clin Pract; 1998; 1(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 10345254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of clinical guidelines using a computer charting system. Effect on the initial care of health care workers exposed to body fluids.
    Schriger DL; Baraff LJ; Rogers WH; Cretin S
    JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1585-90. PubMed ID: 9370504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and implementation of a computer-generated reminder system for diabetes preventive care.
    Nilasena DS; Lincoln MJ; Turner CW; Warner HR; Foerster VA; Williamson JW; Stults BM
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():831-5. PubMed ID: 7950041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a knowledge-based electronic patient record.
    Safran C; Rind DM; Sands DZ; Davis RB; Wald J; Slack WV
    MD Comput; 1996; 13(1):46-54, 63. PubMed ID: 8569464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital Guidelines for Diabetes Management and the Joint Commission-American Diabetes Association Inpatient Diabetes Certification.
    Arnold P; Scheurer D; Dake AW; Hedgpeth A; Hutto A; Colquitt C; Hermayer KL
    Am J Med Sci; 2016 Apr; 351(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 27079338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the impact of the Kuwait Diabetes Care Program on the quality of diabetes care.
    Al-Adsani A; Al-Faraj J; Al-Sultan F; El-Feky M; Al-Mezel N; Saba W; Aljassar S
    Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 18059095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A shared computer-based problem-oriented patient record for the primary care team.
    Linnarsson R; Nordgren K
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1663. PubMed ID: 8591533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.
    Green CJ; Fortin P; Maclure M; Macgregor A; Robinson S
    Int J Med Inform; 2006 Dec; 75(12):818-28. PubMed ID: 16920013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges and opportunities for implementing diabetes self-management guidelines.
    Appiah B; Hong Y; Ory MG; Helduser JW; Begaye D; Bolin JN; Forjuoh SN
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2013; 26(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 23288286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. South Carolina guidelines for diabetes care 2013.
    Hermayer KL; Bruch J; Jenkins CM; Hermayer K
    Am J Med Sci; 2013 Apr; 345(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 23531962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A structured record to implement the national guidelines for diabetes and hypertension care.
    Daniels AR; Patel M; Biesma R; Otten J; Levitt NS; Steyn K; Martell R; Dick J
    S Afr Med J; 2000 Jan; 90(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 10721394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient computer use to prompt doctor adherence to diabetes management guidelines.
    Haller NA; Gil KM; Gardner WG; Whittier FC
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1118-24. PubMed ID: 20367714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Update on the American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care.
    Zitkus BS
    Nurse Pract; 2014 Aug; 39(8):22-32; quiz 32-3. PubMed ID: 24979246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diabetes in the managed care setting: a prospective plan.
    Grundel BL; White GL; Eichold BH
    South Med J; 1999 May; 92(5):459-64. PubMed ID: 10342889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.