103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950041)
1. Development and implementation of a computer-generated reminder system for diabetes preventive care.
Nilasena DS; Lincoln MJ; Turner CW; Warner HR; Foerster VA; Williamson JW; Stults BM
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():831-5. PubMed ID: 7950041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A computer-generated reminder system improves physician compliance with diabetes preventive care guidelines.
Nilasena DS; Lincoln MJ
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1995; ():640-5. PubMed ID: 8563365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines.
Gandhi TK; Sequist TD; Poon EG; Karson AS; Murff H; Fairchild DG; Kuperman GJ; Bates DW
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():848. PubMed ID: 14728353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronically distributed, computer-generated, individualized feedback enhances the use of a computerized practice guideline.
Lobach DF
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():493-7. PubMed ID: 8947715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols.
Litzelman DK; Dittus RS; Miller ME; Tierney WM
J Gen Intern Med; 1993 Jun; 8(6):311-7. PubMed ID: 8320575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lack of chart reminder effectiveness on family medicine resident JNC-VI and NCEP III guideline knowledge and attitudes.
Echlin PS; Upshur RE; Markova TP
BMC Fam Pract; 2004 Jul; 5():14. PubMed ID: 15236663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease.
Sequist TD; Gandhi TK; Karson AS; Fiskio JM; Bugbee D; Sperling M; Cook EF; Orav EJ; Fairchild DG; Bates DW
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2005; 12(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 15802479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders.
Demakis JG; Beauchamp C; Cull WL; Denwood R; Eisen SA; Lofgren R; Nichol K; Woolliscroft J; Henderson WG
JAMA; 2000 Sep; 284(11):1411-6. PubMed ID: 10989404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term changes in compliance with clinical guidelines through computer-based reminders.
Morgan MM; Goodson J; Barnett GO
Proc AMIA Symp; 1998; ():493-7. PubMed ID: 9929268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of routine use of computer-generated preventive reminders in a clinical practice.
Garr DR; Ornstein SM; Jenkins RG; Zemp LD
Am J Prev Med; 1993; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 8439440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof.
O'Connell RT; Cho C; Shah N; Brown K; Shiffman RN
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14527978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and acceptability of patient-oriented computerized diabetes care reminders for use at the point of care.
Sciamanna CN; Gifford DR; Smith RJ
Med Inform Internet Med; 2004 Jun; 29(2):157-68. PubMed ID: 15370995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of clinical guidelines using a computer charting system. Effect on the initial care of health care workers exposed to body fluids.
Schriger DL; Baraff LJ; Rogers WH; Cretin S
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1585-90. PubMed ID: 9370504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adherence to computerized clinical reminders in a large healthcare delivery network.
Agrawal A; Mayo-Smith MF
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):111-4. PubMed ID: 15360785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An adoption study of a clinical reminder system in ambulatory care using a developmental trajectory approach.
Zheng K; Padman R; Johnson MP; Engberg J; Diamond HH
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1115-9. PubMed ID: 15360986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of physician characteristics on compliance with adult preventive care guidelines.
Ely JW; Goerdt CJ; Bergus GR; West CP; Dawson JD; Doebbeling BN
Fam Med; 1998 Jan; 30(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9460614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Management Protocol (CAMP): improved compliance with care guidelines for diabetes mellitus.
Lobach DF; Hammond WE
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():787-91. PubMed ID: 7950032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efforts to improve compliance with the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
Headrick LA; Speroff T; Pelecanos HI; Cebul RD
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Dec; 152(12):2490-6. PubMed ID: 1456861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation: the CHICA system.
Anand V; Biondich PG; Liu G; Rosenman M; Downs SM
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):187-91. PubMed ID: 15360800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A controlled trial of including symptom data in computer-based care suggestions for managing patients with chronic heart failure.
Subramanian U; Fihn SD; Weinberger M; Plue L; Smith FE; Udris EM; McDonell MB; Eckert GJ; Temkit M; Zhou XH; Chen L; Tierney WM
Am J Med; 2004 Mar; 116(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 15006586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
