These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950070)

  • 21. The clinic-specific thesaurus: a means of "lean documentation" in pediatric surgery.
    Schaarschmidt K; Osada N; Köpcke W
    Methods Inf Med; 1997 Aug; 36(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 9293720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automation of a problem list using natural language processing.
    Meystre S; Haug PJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2005 Aug; 5():30. PubMed ID: 16135244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Document versus data centred approach to the EPR.
    Baud R; Rassinoux AM; Lovis C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():853-7. PubMed ID: 10725018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Regenstrief Institute's Medical Gopher: a next-generation homegrown electronic medical record system.
    Duke JD; Morea J; Mamlin B; Martin DK; Simonaitis L; Takesue BY; Dixon BE; Dexter PR
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):170-9. PubMed ID: 24373714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics.
    Roukema J; Los RK; Bleeker SE; van Ginneken AM; van der Lei J; Moll HA
    Pediatrics; 2006 Jan; 117(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16396855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Clinical archiving--requirements and current solutions].
    Schmücker P; Reinhard O; Bess A
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(12):630-4. PubMed ID: 11190888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nursing documentation in the computer-based patient record.
    Walker KP; Prophet CM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 46():313-7. PubMed ID: 10175416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimizing coding quality: the role of the electronic medical record in the context of diagnosis related groups.
    Müller ML; Bürkle T; Irps S; Roeder N; Prokosch HU
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 90():236-40. PubMed ID: 15460694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A usability study of physicians interaction with a paper-based patient record system and a graphical-based electronic patient record system.
    Rodriguez NJ; Murillo V; Borges JA; Ortiz J; Sands DZ
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2002; ():667-71. PubMed ID: 12463908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The electronic patient records of the Hannover Medical School.
    Porth AJ; Niehoff C; Matthies HK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():801-4. PubMed ID: 10725006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Linking the Computerized Severity Index (CSI) to coded patient findings in the HELP system patient database.
    Gibson R; Haug P
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1993; ():673-7. PubMed ID: 8130560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital optical archiving of medical records in hospital information systems: results of a pilot (feasibility) study.
    Dujat C; Schmucker P; Hampl J; Haux R; Schaefer DO; Steinmetz A
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():253. PubMed ID: 8591166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computerized medical record in a private neurotology practice.
    Green JD; Postma DS; Giddings NA; Sapp KR; Skinner T
    Am J Otol; 2000 Jul; 21(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 10912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.
    Viitanen J; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T; Vänskä J; Reponen J; Winblad I
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Oct; 80(10):708-25. PubMed ID: 21784701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of quality control methods for medical documentation.
    Stausberg J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():864-8. PubMed ID: 10179791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Introduction of computer-assisted nursing documentation: quality improvement with PIK (Nursing Information and Communication System)].
    Mahler C
    Pflege Z; 2001 Dec; 54(12):877-81. PubMed ID: 12630157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Analysis of errors in ICD 9 diagnostic classification in compliance with the Federal health care regulation].
    Nitzschke E; Wiegand M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 1462695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computer-based patient record with a cardiologic extension.
    Stam H; van Ginneken AM
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1666. PubMed ID: 8591536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Putting policy into practice: pre- and posttests of implementing standardized languages for nursing documentation.
    Thoroddsen A; Ehnfors M
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1826-38. PubMed ID: 17880471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.