120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950137)
1. Talking about Baby K's fate.
Scofield GR
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):13-6, 46. PubMed ID: 7950137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The medical futility police: head 'em off at the impasse.
Mayo TW
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):23-6, 36. PubMed ID: 7950140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical futility and implications for physician autonomy.
Daar JF
Am J Law Med; 1995; 21(2-3):221-40. PubMed ID: 8571976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ten bad reasons for not treating Baby K.
Fost N
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):17-8, 22. PubMed ID: 7950138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital appeals decision ordering treatment for baby missing a brain.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1993 Sep; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The tyranny of technology: the case of Baby K.
Benesch K
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 7950149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Baby K: protected at law.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 7950150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Managed care: "new moves," moral uncertainty, and a radical attitude.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(4):290-305. PubMed ID: 8750587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Paternalism, disability, and the right to die.
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 8354629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The case of Mr. Stevens.
Cranford RE
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Baby K.
Rhodes AM
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1995; 20(5):251. PubMed ID: 7476007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicine without end?
Caplan AL
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 7950144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical futility: when is enough, enough?
Cultice PN
J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Aug; 27(8):225-32, 256. PubMed ID: 10171943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11652775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The medical futility debate continues.
Struthers MS; Olson BC
Minn Med; 1995 Feb; 78(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 7891646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments.
Crossley M
Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physicians' refusal to provide life-prolonging medical interventions.
Paris JJ; Schreiber MD
Clin Perinatol; 1996 Sep; 23(3):563-71. PubMed ID: 8884127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The purpose of advance medical planning--autonomy for patients or limitation of care?
Levinsky NG
N Engl J Med; 1996 Sep; 335(10):741-3. PubMed ID: 8703178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. No place to go: refusal of life-sustaining treatment by competent persons with physical disabilities.
Herr SS; Bostrom BA; Barton RS
Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(1):3-36. PubMed ID: 1385587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
