These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950149)

  • 21. Conjoined twins: the conflict between parents and the courts over the medical treatment of children.
    Tierney H
    Denver J Int Law Policy; 2002; 30(4):458-75. PubMed ID: 15233119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Death of 'Baby K' leaves a legacy of legal precedents.
    Tousignant M; Miller B
    Washington Post; 1995 Apr; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11647076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Baby Doe: nothing to fear but fear itself.
    Barnett TJ
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2145405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Autonomy, futility, and the limits of medicine.
    Schwartz RL
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1342344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medical futility: when is enough, enough?
    Cultice PN
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Aug; 27(8):225-32, 256. PubMed ID: 10171943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What is left of futility? The convergence of anencephaly and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act.
    Diekema DS
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1995 Oct; 149(10):1156-9. PubMed ID: 7550822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bioethics in a legal forum: confessions of an "expert" witness.
    Fletcher JC
    J Med Philos; 1997 Aug; 22(4):297-324. PubMed ID: 9309546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. From Baby Doe to Baby K: evolving challenges in pediatric ethics. Introduction.
    Glover JJ; Rushton C
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 7627303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nguyen v. Sacred Heart Medical Center.
    Altomare J; Bolde M
    Issues Law Med; 1995; 11(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 7591667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
    Crossley MA
    Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thoughts on the case of Baby K.
    Winkelstein P
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):41. PubMed ID: 7950147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anencephaly and right to life.
    Dóczy LC; Trawöger R; Gedik A
    Lancet; 1993 Dec 18-25; 342(8886-8887):1558-9. PubMed ID: 7902936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Physicians' refusal to provide life-prolonging medical interventions.
    Paris JJ; Schreiber MD
    Clin Perinatol; 1996 Sep; 23(3):563-71. PubMed ID: 8884127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Court permits doctors not to resuscitate gravely handicapped infant.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():22-3. PubMed ID: 11651089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Don't blame the judiciary.
    Prendergast TJ
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 7950146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Federal policy on forgoing treatment or care: contradictions or consistency?
    Uddo BJ
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 1459844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
    Jackson CC
    J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Under the ADA: double standards for HIV-positive patients and providers.
    Zinberg JM
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2000 Apr; 85(4):8-13, 46. PubMed ID: 11349580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Beyond autonomy: judicial restraint and the legal limits necessary to uphold the Hippocratic tradition and preserve the ethical integrity of the medical profession.
    Murphy JJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():451-84. PubMed ID: 10126946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.