These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950150)
1. Baby K: protected at law. Bopp J; Coleson RE Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 7950150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Baby K. U.S. District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division Fed Suppl; 1993 Jul; 832():1022-31. PubMed ID: 11648613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The tyranny of technology: the case of Baby K. Benesch K Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 7950149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases. Bopp J; Coleson RE Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When a patient demands what health care providers deem foolish: medical-ethical analysis of the case of Baby K. Peabody JL Clin Ethics Rep; 1993; 7(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 11653093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. One advocate's viewpoint: conflicts and tensions in the Baby K case. Flannery EJ J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):7-12; discussion 13-4. PubMed ID: 7627307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Anencephalic baby's right to life. McCarthy M Lancet; 1993 Oct; 342(8876):919. PubMed ID: 11643245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital appeals decision ordering treatment for baby missing a brain. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1993 Sep; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary: what is really at stake in Baby K? A response to Ellen Flannery. Clayton EW J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 11644715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medicine without end? Caplan AL Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 7950144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Baby K. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Fed Report; 1994 Feb; 16():590-9. PubMed ID: 11648610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Death of 'Baby K' leaves a legacy of legal precedents. Tousignant M; Miller B Washington Post; 1995 Apr; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11647076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Anencephalic newborns: legal and ethical comments regarding the matter of Baby "K". Fry-Revere S Pediatr Nurs; 1994; 20(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 8008479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Talking about Baby K's fate. Scofield GR Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):13-6, 46. PubMed ID: 7950137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court order to treat baby with partial brain prompts debate on costs and ethics. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1994 Feb; ():20. PubMed ID: 11647018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K. Watson SB Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11652775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Infant resuscitation, a US/UK divide. Miller FH Lancet; 1994 Jun; 343(8913):1584-5. PubMed ID: 7911914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What is left of futility? The convergence of anencephaly and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. Diekema DS Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1995 Oct; 149(10):1156-9. PubMed ID: 7550822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Baby K's mother gives her the prayer that many deny she has. Tousignant M; Miller B Washington Post; 1994 Oct; ():A1, A8-9. PubMed ID: 11647052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Two American hospitals in dilemma over brain death. Charatan FB BMJ; 1994 Mar; 308(6929):618. PubMed ID: 11644525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]