These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950333)

  • 1. Static threshold visual field in glaucoma with the Fastpac algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Is the gain in examination time offset by any loss of information?
    Nordmann JP; Denis P; Nguer Y; Mouton-Chopin D; Saraux H
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1994; 4(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 7950333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.
    O'Brien C; Poinoosawmy D; Wu J; Hitchings R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 78(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 7918261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Trope GE
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Jun; 100(6):949-54. PubMed ID: 8510911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of FASTPAC: a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Flanagan JG; Moss ID; Wild JM; Hudson C; Prokopich L; Whitaker D; O'Neill EC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 231(8):465-9. PubMed ID: 8224946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fastpac visual field screening.
    Young IM; Rait JL; Carson CA; Taylor HR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 2(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8963914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between Fastpac and conventional Humphrey perimetry.
    Young IM; Rait JL; Guest CS; Carson CA; Taylor HR
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1994 May; 22(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 7917272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Iester M; Capris P; Altieri M; Zingirian M; Traverso CE
    Int Ophthalmol; 1999; 23(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 11196128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.
    Tan JCK; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Phu J
    Ophthalmology; 2024 Jun; 131(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 38110124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Jun; 76(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 9686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative comparison of static perimetric strategies in early glaucoma: test-retest variability.
    Spry PG; Henson DB; Sparrow JM; North RV
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Jun; 9(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 10877376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does saving time using FASTPAC or suprathreshold testing reduce quality of visual fields?
    Mills RP; Barnebey HS; Migliazzo CV; Li Y
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Sep; 101(9):1596-603. PubMed ID: 8090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis Based Prediction of Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field Thresholds in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Guo Z; Kwon YH; Lee K; Wang K; Wahle A; Alward WLM; Fingert JH; Bettis DI; Johnson CA; Garvin MK; Sonka M; Abràmoff MD
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Aug; 58(10):3975-3985. PubMed ID: 28796875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Aug; 76(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 9716329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.
    Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Drance SM; Gaasterland D; Mills RP; Ashburn F; Hnik P; Van Coevorden RE
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1910-7. PubMed ID: 9373125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
    Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.