159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950528)
21. Observational evidence.
Hennekens CH; Buring JE
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():18-24; discussion 24. PubMed ID: 8192295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Effectiveness Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Necessity and a Methodological Challenge.
Salleron J; Danese S; D'Agay L; Peyrin-Biroulet L
J Crohns Colitis; 2016 Sep; 10(9):1096-102. PubMed ID: 26944416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Limitations of meta-analysis from published data in epidemiological research].
Blettner M; Schlehofer B; Sauerbrei W
Soz Praventivmed; 1997; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 9221627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bias in surgical research.
Paradis C
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Time-dependent confounding in the estimation of treatment effects in randomised trials with multimodal therapies--an illustration of the problem of time-dependent confounding by causal graphs].
Zietemann VD; Schuster T; Duell TH
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jan; 77(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 24203687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery.
Boutron I; Ravaud P; Nizard R
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jul; 89(7):858-63. PubMed ID: 17673575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bias, Confounding, and Interaction: Lions and Tigers, and Bears, Oh My!
Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
Anesth Analg; 2017 Sep; 125(3):1042-1048. PubMed ID: 28817531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sulphonylurea monotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Hemmingsen B; Schroll JB; Lund SS; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Vaag A; Sonne DP; Lundstrøm LH; Almdal T
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD009008. PubMed ID: 23633364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Observational versus randomised trial evidence.
Lawlor DA; Davey Smith G; Bruckdorfer KR; Kundu D; Ebrahim S
Lancet; 2004 Aug 28-Sep 3; 364(9436):755. PubMed ID: 15337394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical research in obstetrics and gynecology: a Baedeker for busy clinicians.
Grimes DA; Schulz KF
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2002 Sep; 57(9 Suppl 3):S35-53. PubMed ID: 12479352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: methods and limitations.
Hook EB; Regal RR
Epidemiol Rev; 1995; 17(2):243-64. PubMed ID: 8654510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.
Richiardi L; Bellocco R; Zugna D
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1511-9. PubMed ID: 24019424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bias.
Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Real-world research and the role of observational data in the field of gynaecology - a practical review.
Heikinheimo O; Bitzer J; García Rodríguez L
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2017 Aug; 22(4):250-259. PubMed ID: 28817972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reasons for caution when evaluating health care interventions using non-randomised study designs.
Reeves BC
Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd; 2004 Aug; 11 Suppl 1():40-5. PubMed ID: 15353902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advancing the standards of clinical research: the urgent need for new methods and better data.
Herman J
J Eval Clin Pract; 1997 Aug; 3(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 9406110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
Akobeng AK
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence?
Lawlor DA; Davey Smith G; Kundu D; Bruckdorfer KR; Ebrahim S
Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1724-7. PubMed ID: 15158637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
