137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950829)
1. Digital subtraction angiography in potential live-kidney donors: a study of 1000 cases.
Shokeir AA; el-Diasty TA; Nabeeh A; Shaaban AA; el-Kenawy M; Wafa EW; Ghoneim MA
Abdom Imaging; 1994; 19(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 7950829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 100 living-related kidney donor evaluations using digital subtraction angiography.
Flechner SM; Sandler CM; Houston GK; Van Buren CT; Lorber MI; Kahan BD
Transplantation; 1985 Dec; 40(6):675-8. PubMed ID: 3907042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography and helical computed tomography in evaluation of living renal donors.
Watarai Y; Kubo K; Hirano T; Togashi M; Ohashi N; Usuki T; Takeuchi I; Nonomura K; Koyanagi T
Int J Urol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):417-22. PubMed ID: 11555005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of spiral CT angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of renal transplant donors: a pilot study.
Chu C; Young N; Lau H
Australas Radiol; 2001 May; 45(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 11380353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].
Hori S; Narumi Y; Marukawa T; Tanaka T; Tokunaga K; Yoshioka H; Kuroda C; Ichikawa S; Ishibashi M; Takaha M
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Aug; 31(8):1329-37. PubMed ID: 3909790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doppler ultrasonography in evaluation of potential live kidney donors: a prospective study.
el-Azab M; Mohsen T; el-Diasty T; Shokeir AA
J Urol; 1996 Sep; 156(3):878-80. PubMed ID: 8709352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative evaluation of living kidney donors using multirow detector computed tomography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and intraoperative findings.
Hänninen EL; Denecke T; Stelter L; Pech M; Podrabsky P; Pratschke J; Ricke J; Schindler R; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Tullius SG
Transpl Int; 2005 Oct; 18(10):1134-41. PubMed ID: 16162099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spinal intraarterial computed tomography angiography as an effective adjunct for spinal angiography.
Yamamoto S; Kanaya H; Kim P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 26023900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography.
Bakker J; Beek FJ; Beutler JJ; Hene RJ; de Kort GA; de Lange EE; Moons KG; Mali WP
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 9577501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital subtraction angiography for renal donor evaluation.
Cho WH; Jacobs SC; Lawson RK
Urology; 1987 Sep; 30(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 3307096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Renal artery evaluation: comparison of spiral CT angiography to intra-arterial DSA.
Kim TS; Chung JW; Park JH; Kim SH; Yeon KM; Han MC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1998; 9(4):553-9. PubMed ID: 9684822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries. Prospective comparison with conventional arteriography.
Clark RA; Alexander ES
Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6339438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of potential renal donors.
Sussman SK; Weinerth JL; Braun SD; Saeed M; Illescas FF; Cohan RH; Newman GE; Perlmutt LM; Dunnick NR
J Urol; 1987 Jul; 138(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 3298691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of 3-dimensional reconstructed images of renal arteries using rotational digital subtraction angiography.
Endo H; Shimizu T; Kodama Y; Miyasaka K
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2046-8. PubMed ID: 11956435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of donor renal fibromuscular dysplasia: does it justify routine angiography?
Andreoni KA; Weeks SM; Gerber DA; Fair JH; Mauro MA; McCoy L; Scott L; Johnson MW
Transplantation; 2002 Apr; 73(7):1112-6. PubMed ID: 11965042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Preoperative imaging in 78 living kidney donors using CE-MRA and DSA].
Lemke U; Taupitz M; Klüner C; Giessing M; Schönberger B; Hamm B; Kröncke TJ
Rofo; 2008 Jan; 180(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 18092278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
Bakker J; Ligtenberg G; Beek FJ; van Reedt Dortland RW; Hené RJ
Transplantation; 1999 Apr; 67(8):1167-72. PubMed ID: 10232569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective study of carbon dioxide-digital subtraction vs standard contrast arteriography in the evaluation of the renal arteries.
Schreier DZ; Weaver FA; Frankhouse J; Papanicolaou G; Shore E; Yellin AE; Harvey F
Arch Surg; 1996 May; 131(5):503-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 8624196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of renal arteries in living renal donors: comparison between MDCT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography.
Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Hori M; Takahara S; Ichimaru N; Okuyama A; Narumi Y; Nakamura H
Radiat Med; 2006 Nov; 24(9):617-24. PubMed ID: 17111270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective analysis of the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of digital subtraction angiography for living-related renal donor evaluation.
McElroy J; Novick AC; Streem SB; Steinmuller D; Risius B; Buszta C; Steinhilber D
Transplantation; 1986 Jul; 42(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3523878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
