These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7950869)

  • 1. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface.
    Albert K; Schledjewski R; Harbaugh M; Bleser S; Jamison R; Friedrich K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 7950869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
    J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part I: The composite trunnion/ceramic head interface.
    Maharaj G; Bleser S; Albert K; Lambert R; Jani S; Jamison R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 7950868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abrasive wear of ceramic, metal, and UHMWPE bearing surfaces from third-body bone, PMMA bone cement, and titanium debris.
    Davidson JA; Poggie RA; Mishra AK
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 7950870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interfacial shear strength of bioactive-coated carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone after in vivo implantation.
    Nakahara I; Takao M; Goto T; Ohtsuki C; Hibino S; Sugano N
    J Orthop Res; 2012 Oct; 30(10):1618-25. PubMed ID: 22467537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tribological behavior of artificial hip joint under the effects of magnetic field in dry and lubricated sliding.
    Zaki M; Aljinaidi A; Hamed M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(3):205-21. PubMed ID: 12883170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary biomechanical assessment of a polymer composite hip implant using an infrared thermography technique validated by strain gage measurements.
    Bougherara H; Rahim E; Shah S; Dubov A; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):074503. PubMed ID: 21823752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
    Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experimental protocol for mechanical characterization of a femoral implant of carbon-Peek composite hip prosthesis in fatigue].
    Soyer J
    Chirurgie; 1997 Jan; 121(9-10):658-62. PubMed ID: 9138327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of hydroxyapatite coating in resisting wear particle migration and osteolysis around acetabular components.
    Coathup MJ; Blackburn J; Goodship AE; Cunningham JL; Smith T; Blunn GW
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(19):4161-9. PubMed ID: 15664643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomaterial optimization in total disc arthroplasty.
    Hallab N; Link HD; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S139-52. PubMed ID: 14560185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling.
    Weinans H; Huiskes R; Grootenboer HJ
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Nov; 10(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 1403299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis of crestal bone loss around porous-coated dental implants.
    Vaillancourt H; Pilliar RM; McCammond D
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):267-82. PubMed ID: 8589512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wear induced by motion between bone and titanium or cobalt-chrome alloys.
    Bischoff UW; Freeman MA; Smith D; Tuke MA; Gregson PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 Sep; 76(5):713-6. PubMed ID: 8083256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New surface-hardened, low-modulus, corrosion-resistant Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloy for total hip arthroplasty.
    Davidson JA; Mishra AK; Kovacs P; Poggie RA
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 7950871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical testing of a smart spinal implant locking mechanism based on nickel-titanium alloy.
    Yeung KW; Lu WW; Luk KD; Cheung KM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):2296-303. PubMed ID: 16985456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.