These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7951274)

  • 41. The conditional binomial test revisited for clinical trials.
    Lei X; Davis D; Kuan L; Lee J; Oh S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 9855032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Analysis of variations in mortality rates with small numbers.
    Flanders WD; Shipp CC; FitzGerald DM; Lin LS
    Health Serv Res; 1994 Oct; 29(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 7928372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Baseline correction in a two-way randomized blocks design.
    Overall JE; Magee KN
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 1300214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Randomization tests and the unequal-N/unequal-variance problem.
    Mewhort DJ; Kelly MA; Johns BT
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Aug; 41(3):664-7. PubMed ID: 19587176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Distribution of odds ratio in 2 × 2 contingency table: adjustment for correlation.
    Biswas A; Hwang JS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 21191860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):129-55. PubMed ID: 3582958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An ancient black art.
    Koehnle TJ; Schank JC
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 19929115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
    Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Testing overall and moderator effects in random effects meta-regression.
    Huizenga HM; Visser I; Dolan CV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Feb; 64(Pt 1):1-19. PubMed ID: 21506942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Drop-outs and a random regression model.
    Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Jul; 7(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 9252832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The analysis of small-sample multivariate data.
    Saranadasa H; Altan S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Mar; 8(1):163-86. PubMed ID: 9547434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysis of interventions influencing or reducing patient waiting while stratifying by surgical procedure.
    Ledolter J; Dexter F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Apr; 112(4):950-7. PubMed ID: 21385983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A score test for overdispersion in zero-inflated poisson mixed regression model.
    Xiang L; Lee AH; Yau KK; McLachlan GJ
    Stat Med; 2007 Mar; 26(7):1608-22. PubMed ID: 16794991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A SAS(®) macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal-Wallis analysis.
    Elliott AC; Hynan LS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Apr; 102(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21146248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Ignoring overdispersion in hierarchical loglinear models: Possible problems and solutions.
    Milanzi E; Alonso A; Molenberghs G
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1475-82. PubMed ID: 22362329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. On the use of randomization tests following adaptive designs.
    Galbete A; Rosenberger WF
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 26043105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of observation-level random effect and Beta-Binomial models for modelling overdispersion in Binomial data in ecology & evolution.
    Harrison XA
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1114. PubMed ID: 26244118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Twice random, once mixed: applying mixed models to simultaneously analyze random effects of language and participants.
    Janssen DP
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):232-47. PubMed ID: 21858733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.