These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7951957)

  • 21. Weight-bearing three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of the forefoot in patients with flatfoot deformity.
    Yoshioka N; Ikoma K; Kido M; Imai K; Maki M; Arai Y; Fujiwara H; Tokunaga D; Inoue N; Kubo T
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Mar; 21(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 26786344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Innervation of three weight-bearing areas of the foot: an anatomic study and clinical implications.
    Unlü RE; Orbay H; Kerem M; Esmer AF; Tüccar E; Sensöz O
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 17400530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.
    Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Cochrane review of the evidence for non-surgical interventions for flexible pediatric flat feet.
    Evans AM; Rome K
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Mar; 47(1):69-89. PubMed ID: 21448121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk factors that may adversely modify the natural history of the pediatric pronated foot.
    Napolitano C; Walsh S; Mahoney L; McCrea J
    Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 2000 Jul; 17(3):397-417. PubMed ID: 10943496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements.
    Murley GS; Menz HB; Landorf KB
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2009 Jul; 2():22. PubMed ID: 19575811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship of flatfoot and high arch with main anthropometric variables.
    Atamturk D
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2009; 43(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19717944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative analysis of distribution on the sole surface of arched feet and flat feet].
    Szczygieł E; Golec E; Golec J; Mazur T; Sobczyk Ł
    Przegl Lek; 2008; 65(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 18669101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiographic comparison of standing medial cuneiform arch height in adults with and without acquired flatfoot deformity.
    Arangio GA; Wasser T; Rogman A
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Aug; 27(8):636-8. PubMed ID: 16919219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of foot shape on the three-dimensional position of foot bones.
    Ledoux WR; Rohr ES; Ching RP; Sangeorzan BJ
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Dec; 24(12):2176-86. PubMed ID: 16921526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction on the plantar pressure characteristics and the kinematics of the arch and the hindfoot.
    Imhauser CW; Siegler S; Abidi NA; Frankel DZ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 14967579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of heel height on in-shoe localized triaxial stresses.
    Cong Y; Cheung JT; Leung AK; Zhang M
    J Biomech; 2011 Aug; 44(12):2267-72. PubMed ID: 21705002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medial longitudinal arch biomechanics evaluation during gait in subjects with flexible flatfoot.
    Prachgosin T; Chong DY; Leelasamran W; Smithmaitrie P; Chatpun S
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2015; 17(4):121-30. PubMed ID: 26898763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity and age-related differences in foot and ankle kinematics during the single-limb heel-rise test.
    Chimenti RL; Tome J; Hillin CD; Flemister AS; Houck J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Apr; 44(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 24568257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Foot shape and its effect on functioning in Royal Australian Air Force recruits. Part 1: Prospective cohort study.
    Esterman A; Pilotto L
    Mil Med; 2005 Jul; 170(7):623-8. PubMed ID: 16130646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Runner's knowledge of their foot type: do they really know?
    Hohmann E; Reaburn P; Imhoff A
    Foot (Edinb); 2012 Sep; 22(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 22608204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical analysis of foot with different foot arch heights: a finite element analysis.
    Sun PC; Shih SL; Chen YL; Hsu YC; Yang RC; Chen CS
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 21614705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children using the Heidelberg foot measurement method.
    Twomey D; McIntosh AS; Simon J; Lowe K; Wolf SI
    Gait Posture; 2010 May; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20172730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability in pediatric feet.
    Saraswat P; MacWilliams BA; Davis RB
    Gait Posture; 2012 Apr; 35(4):547-55. PubMed ID: 22192872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Foot posture is associated with morphometry of the peroneus longus muscle, tibialis anterior tendon, and Achilles tendon.
    Murley GS; Tan JM; Edwards RM; De Luca J; Munteanu SE; Cook JL
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2014 Jun; 24(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 23301865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.