112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7952458)
1. Cost analysis of Hickman catheter insertion at bedside in gynecologic oncology patients.
Mannel RS; Manetta A; Hickman RL; Walker JL; Berman ML; DiSaia PJ
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Nov; 179(5):558-60. PubMed ID: 7952458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
Horattas MC; Trupiano J; Hopkins S; Pasini D; Martino C; Murty A
Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized, prospective trial of standard Hickman compared with Groshong central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients.
Warner BW; Haygood MM; Davies SL; Hennies GA
J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Aug; 183(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 8696545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Blind" placement of long-term central venous access devices: report of 589 consecutive procedures.
Kincaid EH; Davis PW; Chang MC; Fenstermaker JM; Pennell TC
Am Surg; 1999 Jun; 65(6):520-3; discussion 523-4. PubMed ID: 10366205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effective supply use in permanent central venous catheter operations.
Howard TJ; Stines CP; O'Connor JA; Schuster WS; Wiebke EA
Am Surg; 1997 May; 63(5):441-5. PubMed ID: 9128234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of Groshong central venous catheters on a gynecologic oncology service.
Holloway RW; Orr JW
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Feb; 56(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 7896188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chronic venous access: bedside placement technique and complications.
Goldfarb PM; Coldwell D
Cancer Pract; 1994; 2(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 7858655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safe techniques for inserting the hickman catheter in pediatric patients.
Masumoto K; Uesugi T; Nagata K; Takada N; Taguchi S; Ogita K; Yamanouchi T; Taguchi T; Suita S
Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2006; 23(7):531-40. PubMed ID: 16928648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.
Cowl CT; Weinstock JV; Al-Jurf A; Ephgrave K; Murray JA; Dillon K
Clin Nutr; 2000 Aug; 19(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10952794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implantable venous access device insertion using interventional radiologic versus conventional operating room methods in pediatric patients with cancer.
Hancock-Howard R; Connolly BL; McMahon M; Menon A; Woo G; Wales PW; Aziza A; Laporte A; Nauenberg E; Ungar WJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 May; 21(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 20347335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Insertion of Hickman catheters in an interventional radiology suite].
Konen E; Garniak A; Morag B; Hardan I; Rubinstein Z
Harefuah; 1997 Apr; 132(7):454-7, 528, 527. PubMed ID: 9153910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of Hickman line- and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy.
Ng F; Mastoroudes H; Paul E; Davies N; Tibballs J; Hochhauser D; Mayer A; Begent R; Meyer T
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2007 Sep; 19(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 17517500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis.
Grover A; Robbins J; Bendick P; Gibson M; Villalba M
Am Surg; 2001 Apr; 67(4):297-301; discussion 301-2. PubMed ID: 11307993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insertion of Hickman catheters by the percutaneous technique.
Teh A; Leong KW
Med J Malaysia; 1995 Dec; 50(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 8668056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy.
Massick DD; Yao S; Powell DM; Griesen D; Hobgood T; Allen JN; Schuller DE
Laryngoscope; 2001 Mar; 111(3):494-500. PubMed ID: 11224782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.
Unal AE; Bayar S; Arat M; Ilhan O
Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Feb; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12620263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripherally inserted central catheters in the patient with cardiomyopathy. The most cost-effective venous acess.
Major BM; Crow MM
J Intraven Nurs; 2000; 23(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 11847708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous insertion of Hickman catheters while the patient is in bed: a simplification of the technique.
Morales M; Dorta J
Support Care Cancer; 1994 Jul; 2(4):270-1. PubMed ID: 8087448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
