These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7952805)
21. Relationship between velopharyngeal closure, hypernasality, nasal air emission and nasal rustle in subjects with repaired cleft palate. Scarmagnani RH; Barbosa DA; Fukushiro AP; Salgado MH; Trindade IE; Yamashita RP Codas; 2015; 27(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 26222944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The correlations of two methods in the evaluation of velopharyngeal competence]. Luo Y; Wang G; Ma L Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Sep; 30(5):266-7. PubMed ID: 8728963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with cleft palate. McComb RW; Marrinan EM; Nuss RC; Labrie RA; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2226-32. PubMed ID: 21783004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nasalance scores of children with repaired cleft palate who exhibit normal velopharyngeal closure during aerodynamic testing. Zajac DJ Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2013 Aug; 22(3):572-6. PubMed ID: 23813202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Magnetic resonance imaging as an aid in the dynamic assessment of the velopharyngeal mechanism in children. Kao DS; Soltysik DA; Hyde JS; Gosain AK Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):572-577. PubMed ID: 18626376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of velopharyngeal motion in chinese children after primary palatal repair. Tian W; Li Y; Yin H; Zhao SF; Li S; Wang Y; Shi B J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):578-87. PubMed ID: 20216434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of velopharyngeal closure by CT scan and endoscopy. Honjo I; Mitoma T; Ushiro K; Kawano M Plast Reconstr Surg; 1984 Nov; 74(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 6494319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Endoscopy and electromyography in the evaluation of the velopharyngeal function in the cleft patient]. Heiner H; Schumann D; Erler U Stomatol DDR; 1981 Nov; 31(11):819-27. PubMed ID: 6949355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Proposal for velopharyngeal function rating in a speech perceptual assessment]. Trindade IE; Genaro KF; Yamashita RP; Miguel HC; Fukushiro AP Pro Fono; 2005; 17(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 16909536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vocal characteristics of children with cleft lip/palate and associated velopharyngeal incompetence. Lewis JR; Andreassen ML; Leeper HA; Macrae DL; Thomas J J Otolaryngol; 1993 Apr; 22(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 8515508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Velar ascent and morphological factors affecting velopharyngeal function in patients with cleft palate and noncleft controls: a cephalometric study. Satoh K; Wada T; Tachimura T; Fukuda J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 15695038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomies on velopharyngeal and speech functions in cleft patients. Janulewicz J; Costello BJ; Buckley MJ; Ford MD; Close J; Gassner R J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 62(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 15015163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of velopharyngeal gap size in patients with hypernasality, hypernasality and nasal emission, or nasal turbulence (rustle) as the primary speech characteristic. Kummer AW; Curtis C; Wiggs M; Lee L; Strife JL Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 1571348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [High-frequency videocinematograpphy for the objective imaging of the velopharyngeal closure mechanism in cleft palate patients]. Sader R; Horch HH; Herzog M; Zeilhofer HF; Hannig C; Hess U; Bünte E; Böhme G Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1994 Aug; 55(4):169-75. PubMed ID: 7959485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Speech and velopharyngeal function in children with an open residual cleft in the hard palate, and the influence of temporary covering. Lohmander-Agerskov A; Dotevall H; Lith A; Söderpalm E Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jul; 33(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 8827390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Aerodynamic and cephalometric analyses of velopharyngeal structure and function following re-pushback surgery for secondary correction in cleft palate. Nakamura N; Ogata Y; Sasaguri M; Suzuki A; Kikuta R; Ohishi M Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Jan; 40(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 12498605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A study of the measurement errors associated with the analysis of velar movements assessed from lateral videofluoroscopic investigations. Birch MJ; Sommerlad BC; Fenn C; Butterworth M Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 Nov; 36(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 10574668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Implications of Nasal Substitutions in the Early Phonology of Toddlers With Repaired Cleft Palate. Hardin-Jones MA; Chapman KL Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Oct; 55(9):1258-1266. PubMed ID: 29624438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]