These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7953225)

  • 1. A comparative study of peri-prosthetic bone mineral density measurement using two different dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems.
    Cohen B; Rushton N
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):852-5. PubMed ID: 7953225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of periprosthetic bone density in hip arthroplasty using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Reproducibility of measurements.
    Smart RC; Barbagallo S; Slater GL; Kuo RS; Butler SP; Drummond RP; Sekel R
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 8792252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative performance in vitro and in vivo of Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Laskey MA; Flaxman ME; Barber RW; Trafford S; Hayball MP; Lyttle KD; Crisp AJ; Compston JE
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1023-9. PubMed ID: 1742583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
    Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study.
    Venesmaa PK; Kröger HP; Miettinen HJ; Jurvelin JS; Suomalainen OT; Alhava EM
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Jun; 16(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 11393782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of longitudinal measurements in the spine and proximal femur using lunar and hologic instruments.
    Pocock NA; Noakes KA; Griffiths M; Bhalerao N; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA; Freund J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Dec; 12(12):2113-8. PubMed ID: 9421245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of rates of bone loss from the spine measured using two manufacturers' densitometers.
    Peel NF; Eastell R
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Nov; 10(11):1796-801. PubMed ID: 8592958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments.
    Pocock NA; Sambrook PN; Nguyen T; Kelly P; Freund J; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Sep; 7(9):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1414500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peri-prosthetic bone density after implantation of a custom-made femoral component. A five-year follow-up.
    Leichtle UG; Leichtle CI; Schmidt B; Martini F
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Apr; 88(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 16567780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of a new positioner on the precision of hip bone mineral density measurements.
    Hans D; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Horn S; Avioli LV; Drezner MK; Meunier PJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Aug; 12(8):1289-94. PubMed ID: 9258760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Influence of preoperative bone mass density in periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of ABG-II prosthesis: A 10-year follow-up].
    Aguilar Ezquerra A; Panisello Sebastiá JJ; Mateo Agudo J
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2016; 60(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 26318807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement and accuracy of bone mineral after unilateral total hip arthroplasty.
    Bloebaum RD; Liau DW; Lester DK; Rosenbaum TG
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4):612-22. PubMed ID: 16781417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship.
    Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Yang SO; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Nelson DL; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1425-7. PubMed ID: 7817826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement: alumina-on-alumina versus alumina-on-polyethylene articulation.
    Kim YH; Yoon SH; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Feb; 89(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 17322430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of bone density from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty: analysis protocols and reproducibility.
    Trevisan C; Bigoni M; Cherubini R; Steiger P; Randelli G; Ortolani S
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Sep; 53(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 8242466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the effect of different reference data on Lunar DPX and Hologic QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
    Laskey MA; Crisp AJ; Cole TJ; Compston JE
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Dec; 65(780):1124-9. PubMed ID: 1286422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems.
    Svendsen OL; Marslew U; Hassager C; Christiansen C
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1992; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 1547807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Periprosthetic mineral density in cement-free hip replacement arthroplasty].
    Reiter A; Sabo D; Simank HG; Büchner T; Seidel M; Lukoschek M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 9499515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision of periprosthetic bone mineral density measurements using Hologic Windows versus DOS-based analysis software.
    Shetty NR; Hamer AJ; Stockley I; Eastell R; Wilkinson JM
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 16931357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.