These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7953226)

  • 1. Measurements of the frequency distribution of optical density in screening mammography.
    Kotre CJ; Robson KJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):856-9. PubMed ID: 7953226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consistency of film optical density in mammographic screening programmes.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Apr; 69(820):306-10. PubMed ID: 8665129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of a contrast-detail test object in the optimization of optical density in mammography.
    Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):277-82. PubMed ID: 7735767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing optical density of a Kodak mammography film-screen combination with standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM; al Yousef K
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 71(849):950-3. PubMed ID: 10195010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Film-screen combinations for mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 May; 1(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 1878377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film-screen combinations.
    Meeson S; Young KC; Rust A; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Ramsdale ML
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):825-35. PubMed ID: 11560831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of image quality on 28 mammography X-ray sets in the UK.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1131-8. PubMed ID: 9536904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
    de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skin edge perception in mammograms: a comparison of two film-screen combinations.
    Meeson S; Young KC; Cooke J
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):370-5. PubMed ID: 10844862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance results from a breast screening pilot study.
    Thiele DL
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 1953503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of mammography equipment in the Macedonian breast screening campaign 2008/2009.
    Gershan V; Antevska-Grujoska S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):187-91. PubMed ID: 21733866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two mammography film-screen combinations designed for standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):73-5. PubMed ID: 10341692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A phantom for the measurement of contrast detail performance in film-screen mammography.
    Thompson SR; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1049-55. PubMed ID: 1742587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Guideline for the additional test positions according to the EPQC 4th Edition for Digital Mammography Systems].
    Sommer A; Lenzen H; Blaser D; Ehlers SE; Schopphoven S; John C;
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):845-50. PubMed ID: 19676011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review.
    Baines CJ; Miller AB; Kopans DB; Moskowitz M; Sanders DE; Sickles EA; To T; Wall C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):743-7; discussion 748-9. PubMed ID: 2119103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography screen-film selection: individual facility testing technique.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett L; Gold RH; Parkinson B
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1195-9. PubMed ID: 1435598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Physical and technical quality assurance in German breast cancer screening: progress report of the Reference Center Muenster after three years].
    Sommer A; Girnus R; Wendt B; Czwoydzinski J; Wüstenbecker C; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 19391067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.