138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7954312)
1. Gradient echo imaging of the lumbar spine.
Wasenko JJ; Rosenbaum AE; Yu SF; Falen SW; Collins CS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1994; 18(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 7954312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the lumbar spine: comparison with spin-echo technique.
Watanabe AT; Teitelbaum GP; Lufkin RB; Tsuruda JS; Jinkins JR; Bradley WG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 2335609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading.
Nowicki BH; Haughton VM; Schmidt TA; Lim TH; An HS; Riley LH; Yu L; Hong JW
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Oct; 17(9):1605-14. PubMed ID: 8896609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical ligaments in the absence of trauma.
Saifuddin A; Green R; White J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1686-91; discussion 1691-2. PubMed ID: 12897492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extradural inflammation associated with annular tears: demonstration with gadolinium-enhanced lumbar spine MRI.
Saifuddin A; Mitchell R; Taylor BA
Eur Spine J; 1999; 8(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 10190852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fat-suppressed T2* sequences for routine 3.0-tesla lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary report.
McKinney AM; Gadani S; Palmer CS; Vidarsson L
Acta Radiol; 2008 Sep; 49(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 18608016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphometric studies of the ligamentum flavum: a correlative microanatomical and MRI study of the lumbar spine.
Winkler PA; Zausinger S; Milz S; Buettner A; Wiesmann M; Tonn JC
Zentralbl Neurochir; 2007 Nov; 68(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 17963193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumbar degenerative disk disease: prospective comparison of conventional T2-weighted spin-echo imaging and T2-weighted rapid acquisition relaxation-enhanced imaging.
Ross JS; Ruggieri P; Tkach J; Obuchowski N; Dillinger J; Masaryk TJ; Modic MT
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(5):1215-23. PubMed ID: 8237706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast on T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine using fast spin-echo and gated conventional spin-echo sequences.
Chappell PM; Glover GH; Enzmann DR
Neuroradiology; 1995 Apr; 37(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 7603591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging of the spine and nerve roots.
Maus TP
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2002 Aug; 13(3):487-544, vi. PubMed ID: 12380547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between magnetization transfer contrast and fast spin-echo MR imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
Yoshioka H; Onaya H; Itai Y; Nishimura H; Matsumura A; Tsunoda T; Kandatsu S; Koga M; Yoshikawa K; Kato H; Tsujii H
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9084023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with the thickness of the ligamentum flavum: is ligamentum flavum thickening due to hypertrophy or buckling?
Altinkaya N; Yildirim T; Demir S; Alkan O; Sarica FB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(16):E1093-7. PubMed ID: 21343862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine.
Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Degenerative lumbar spine disorders in gradient refocused echo axial magnetic resonance images.
Murayama S; Numaguchi Y; Robinson AE
Clin Imaging; 1990 Aug; 14(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 2224620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].
van Roy P; Barbaix E; Clarijs JP; Mense S
Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Magnetic resonance imaging of diseased cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs].
Kadoya S; Nakamura T; Takarada A; Yamamoto I; Sato S
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 1989 Feb; 29(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 2475812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal and degenerative posterior spinal structures: MR imaging.
Grenier N; Kressel HY; Schiebler ML; Grossman RI; Dalinka MK
Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 3659376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normal and pathologic anatomy of the lumbar root canals.
Rauschning W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1987 Dec; 12(10):1008-19. PubMed ID: 3441815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of T1-weighted fast spin-echo and T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of the lumbar spine at 3.0 Tesla.
Lavdas E; Vlychou M; Arikidis N; Kapsalaki E; Roka V; Fezoulidis IV
Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 20170294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
