94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7954569)
1. Accuracy of quantification of coronary arteriograms with hand-held calipers. A validation study.
Atar D; Saunamäki K
Cardiology; 1994; 85(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 7954569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of coronary artery stenosis pressure gradient by quantitative coronary arteriography in patients with coronary artery disease.
Atar D; Ramanujam PS; Saunamäki K; Haunsø S
Clin Physiol; 1994 Jan; 14(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 8149707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions.
Kirkeeide RL; Gould KL; Parsel L
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Jan; 7(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 3941196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of electronic digital calipers compared with quantitative angiography in measuring coronary arterial diameter.
Uehata A; Matsuguchi T; Bittl JA; Orav J; Meredith IT; Anderson TJ; Selwyn AP; Ganz P; Yeung AC
Circulation; 1993 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):1724-9. PubMed ID: 8403318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative coronary arteriography using 6 and 8 French catheters with cine angiographic acquisition.
Ellis SG; Pinto IM; McGillem MJ; DeBoe SF; LeFree MT; Mancini GB
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Jan; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 1995176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method.
Mancini GB; Simon SB; McGillem MJ; LeFree MT; Friedman HZ; Vogel RA
Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):452-60. PubMed ID: 3802448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physiologic assessment of the coronary collateral circulation in transplanted human hearts.
Johnson TH; Das GS; McGinn AL; Christensen BV; Meyer SM; Wilson RF
J Heart Lung Transplant; 1994; 13(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 7803425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.
Wunderlich W; Roehrig B; Fischer F; Arntz HR; Agrawal R; Morguet A; Schultheiss HP; Horstkotte D
Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Aug; 14(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 9934610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of automated quantitative coronary angiography with caliper measurements of percent diameter stenosis.
Kalbfleisch SJ; McGillem MJ; Pinto IM; Kavanaugh KM; DeBoe SF; Mancini GB
Am J Cardiol; 1990 May; 65(18):1181-4. PubMed ID: 2337026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurements during diagnostic catheterization.
Ganz P; Abben R; Friedman PL; Garnic JD; Barry WH; Levin DC
Am J Cardiol; 1985 Apr; 55(8):910-4. PubMed ID: 3157307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of digital and cine coronary arteriography.
Gurley JC; Nissen SE
Int J Card Imaging; 1990; 5(2-3):105-18. PubMed ID: 2230289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of measurements of coronary narrowings by videodensitometry and by digital calipers.
Balkin J; Rosenmann D; Ilan M; Zion MM
Cardiology; 1992; 81(4-5):238-44. PubMed ID: 1301249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronary artery stenoses. Relationship between angiographic severity and impact on mean diastolic pressure gradient.
Bateman TM; Gray RJ; Raymond MJ; Miyamoto AT; Chaux A; Kass RM; Lee ME; Stewart ME; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Apr; 85(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 6601209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative coronary arteriography and its assessment of atherosclerosis. Part II. Calculating stenosis flow reserve from percent diameter stenosis.
Fleming RM; Harrington GM
Angiology; 1994 Oct; 45(10):835-40. PubMed ID: 7943934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rationale and application of coronary transstenotic pressure gradient measurements.
De Bruyne B; Paulus WJ; Pijls NH
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Nov; 33(3):250-61. PubMed ID: 7874721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of simultaneously performed digital and film-based angiography in assessment of coronary artery disease.
Gurley JC; Nissen SE; Booth DC; Harrison M; Grayburn P; Elion JL; DeMaria AN
Circulation; 1988 Dec; 78(6):1411-20. PubMed ID: 3191595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postmortem validation of the automated coronary analysis (ACA) software package.
van der Geest RJ; Morris KG; Cusma JT; Reiber JH
Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Jun; 10(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 7963757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilization of translesional hemodynamics: comparison of pressure and flow methods in stenosis assessment in patients with coronary artery disease.
Di Mario C; Gil R; de Feyter PJ; Schuurbiers JC; Serruys PW
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jun; 38(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 8776528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities.
Reiber JH; van der Zwet PM; Koning G; von Land CD; van Meurs B; Gerbrands JJ; Buis B; van Voorthuisen AE
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Mar; 28(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 8439993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal detection of the progression of coronary artery disease: comparison of methods suitable for risk factor intervention trials.
Ellis S; Sanders W; Goulet C; Miller R; Cain KC; Lesperance J; Bourassa MG; Alderman EL
Circulation; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1235-42. PubMed ID: 3779911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
