BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7954574)

  • 1. Strut interlocking of titanium Greenfield vena cava filters and its effect on clot capturing: an in vitro study.
    Korbin CD; Van Allan RJ; Andrews RT; Katz MD; Teitelbaum GP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1994; 17(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 7954574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of clinically available inferior vena cava filters with an in vitro physiologic simulation of the vena cava.
    Simon M; Rabkin DJ; Kleshinski S; Kim D; Ransil BJ
    Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 8234702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of filters in an oversized vena caval phantom: intracaval placement of a bird's nest filter versus biiliac placement of Greenfield, Vena Tech-LGM, and Simon nitinol filters.
    Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Pentecost MJ; Teitelbaum GP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Aug; 3(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1515730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro and in vivo experimental evaluation of a new vena caval filter.
    Qian Z; Yasui K; Nazarian GK; Vlodaver Z; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8054757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clover leaf inferior vena cava filter: in vitro evaluation of filter deployment and comparison of emboli-capturing ability.
    Palestrant AM; Faykus MH
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1991 Feb; 2(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 1799740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new titanium Greenfield vena cava filter: initial experience and review.
    Lim MC; Tan HC; Choo MH
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 7761890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple emboli and filter function: an in vitro comparison of three vena cava filters.
    Xian ZY; Roy S; Hosaka J; Kvernebo K; Laerum F
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(6):887-93. PubMed ID: 8850665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
    Swaminathan TN; Hu HH; Patel AA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 16706585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro study of guide wire entrapment in currently available inferior vena cava filters.
    Stavropoulos SW; Itkin M; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jul; 14(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 12847198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro function of an adjustable temporary venous spring filter: comparison with the temporary RF02 filter and the permanent Greenfield vena cava filter.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 9750891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of clot capture efficiency of an absorbable vena cava filter.
    Dria SJ; Eggers MD
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2016 Oct; 4(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 27639002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective randomized study comparing the clinical outcomes between inferior vena cava Greenfield and TrapEase filters.
    Usoh F; Hingorani A; Ascher E; Shiferson A; Patel N; Gopal K; Marks N; Jacob T
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Aug; 52(2):394-9. PubMed ID: 20570472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early duplex scan evaluation of four vena caval interruption devices.
    Aswad MA; Sandager GP; Pais SO; Malloy PC; Killewich LA; Lilly MP; Flinn WR
    J Vasc Surg; 1996 Nov; 24(5):809-18. PubMed ID: 8918328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness.
    Becker DM; Philbrick JT; Selby JB
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 152(10):1985-94. PubMed ID: 1417371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro comparison of the hemodynamics of two inferior vena cava filters.
    Couch GG; Johnston KW; Ojha M
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Mar; 31(3):539-49. PubMed ID: 10709068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporary inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison with permanent IVC filters.
    Stoneham GW; Burbridge BE; Millward SF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 8541676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro metal fatigue testing of inferior vena cava filters.
    Bjarnason H; Yedlicka JW; Hunter DW; Castañeda-Zuñiga WR; Amplatz K
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Sep; 29(9):817-21. PubMed ID: 7995699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of incompletely opened Vena Tech-LGM vena caval filters.
    Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Kokoris SP; Teitelbaum GP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1993; 16(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8435832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term follow-up of Greenfield inferior vena cava filter placement in children.
    Cahn MD; Rohrer MJ; Martella MB; Cutler BS
    J Vasc Surg; 2001 Nov; 34(5):820-5. PubMed ID: 11700481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suprarenal vena caval filter placement: follow-up of four filter types in 22 patients.
    Matchett WJ; Jones MP; McFarland DR; Ferris EJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1998; 9(4):588-93. PubMed ID: 9684828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.