119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7956654)
1. Cervicovaginal cytology and the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: a comparison with immunofluorescent results.
Caudill JL; Humphrey SK; Goellner JR
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 7956654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Chlamydia trachomatis: significance of endocervical sampling in diagnosis by the Papanicolaou method].
Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Yamamoto LS; Maeda MY; da Costa LM; dos Santos SI
Rev Paul Med; 1989; 107(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 2482528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing two methods of detection for Chlamydia trachomatis in liquid-based Papanicolaou tests.
Levi AW; Beckman D; Hui P; Schofield K; Harigopal M; Chhieng DC
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Aug; 138(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 22904135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining with cell culture.
Quinn TC; Gupta PK; Burkman RT; Kappus EW; Barbacci M; Spence MR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 157(2):394-9. PubMed ID: 3303938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chlamydia trachomatis infection monitoring with cytomorphology, direct immunofluorescence and "in vitro" growth method.
Cardillo MR; Sollecito D; Coghi I; Midulla M
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1985; 6(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 2996899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of cytology for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.
Cornetta Mda C; Gonçalves AK; Bertini AM
Braz J Infect Dis; 2006 Oct; 10(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 17293922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Chlamydia trachomatis in smears of irradiated uterine cervix: cytologic and immunocytochemical aspects].
Santos DR; Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Oyafuso M; Shih LW; Cavaliere MJ; Marziona F; De Carvalho MI
Rev Paul Med; 1989; 107(4-6):229-32. PubMed ID: 2701191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of proposed cytomorphologic criteria for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in Papanicolaou smears.
Bernal JN; Martinez MA; Dabancens A
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 2728785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent cytology and chlamydia sampling: a comparison of immunofluorescence and culture for detection of chlamydia.
Szarewski A; Pompey A; Cronin D; Bertrand J; Bradbeer C; Thin RN
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(5):367-8. PubMed ID: 1958724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between chlamydia infection and clinical evaluation, vaginal wet smear, and cervical swab test in female adolescents.
Thejls H; Rahm VA; Rosen G; Gnarpe H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 157(4 Pt 1):974-6. PubMed ID: 3674172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study of three assays for serum IgA against Chlamydia trachomatis].
Fuentes V; Anarratone F; Froissart M; Orfila J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1991 Feb; 39(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 2017335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How sensitive is the Papanicolaou smear in the diagnosis of infections with Chlamydia trachomatis?
Giampaolo C; Murphy J; Benes S; McCormack WM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Dec; 80(6):844-9. PubMed ID: 6688921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A
Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of chlamydia in cervical smears by immunofluorescence: technic, sensitivity, and specificity.
Lindner LE; Geerling S; Nettum JA; Miller SL; Altman KH; Wechter SR
Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Feb; 85(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 3511673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can a gynecologic Chlamydia trachomatis infection be diagnosed by direct observation of an endocervical plain slide?
De Wilde RL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):786. PubMed ID: 3048107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Validity of the direct immunofluorescent monoclonal antibody test in the diagnosis of chlamydial infection].
Vrcić H; Simunić V; Grizelj V; Suchanek E; Kruzicević V
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1990; 30(1-2):7-9. PubMed ID: 2214861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of microtrak direct test for Chlamydia trachomatis in a prevalence study.
Godfrey E; Winn W; Keathley JD
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 Nov; 5(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 3536276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The direct immunofluorescence test for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in gynecology].
Maĭnkhard K; Borisov I
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1995; 34(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 7485791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevalence of cervicovaginal infections during gestation and accuracy of clinical diagnosis.
Simões JA; Giraldo PC; Faúndes A
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 9785109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Epidemiological findings on Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the female genitalia. Comparison of detection methods].
Garella D; Zotti C; Moiraghi Ruggenini A; Latino MA; Gordini G; Peretto M; Ramella A
G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1984; 77(1-6):94-105. PubMed ID: 6399275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
