124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7956657)
1. Efficacy of ThinPrep preparation of cervical smears: a 1,000-case, investigator-sponsored study.
Awen C; Hathway S; Eddy W; Voskuil R; Janes C
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(1):33-6; discussion 36-7. PubMed ID: 7956657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey.
Abulafia O; Pezzullo JC; Sherer DM
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12821354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved Accuracy for Cervical Cytology with the ThinPrep Method and the Endocervical Brush-Spatula Collection Procedure.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Hutchinson ML
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 1998 Jan; 2(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 25951356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study.
Monsonego J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Br J Cancer; 2001 Feb; 84(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 11161401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Australian trial of ThinPrep: a new cytopreparatory technique.
Laverty CR; Thurloe JK; Redman NL; Farnsworth A
Cytopathology; 1995 Jun; 6(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 7669924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic efficacy and validity of the ThinPrep method in cervical cytology.
Tezuka F; Oikawa H; Shuki H; Higashiiwai H
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8669188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Liquid phase cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer: a multicenter study].
Monsonégo J; Autillo-Touati A; Bergeron C; Dachez R; Liaras J; Saurel J; Zerat L; Chatelain P; Mottot C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Nov; 29(11):799-807. PubMed ID: 11770273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of cellular residue in the ThinPrep PreservCyt vial.
Massarani-Wafai R; Bakhos R; Wojcik EM; Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Sep; 23(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 10945912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test as an adjunct to the conventional Pap smear.
Roberts JM; Gurley AM; Thurloe JK; Bowditch R; Laverty CR
Med J Aust; 1997 Nov; 167(9):466-9. PubMed ID: 9397059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening.
Lee KR; Ashfaq R; Birdsong GG; Corkill ME; McIntosh KM; Inhorn SL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 9241308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.
Kavak ZN; Eren F; Pekin S; Küllü S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Nov; 35(4):446-9. PubMed ID: 8717577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear.
Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear.
Rahnama P; Faghihzadeh S; Ziaei S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15670299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology.
Linder J; Zahniser D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell block findings from residual PreservCyt samples in unsatisfactory ThinPrep Paps: no additional benefit.
Kabbani W; Raisanen J; Thomas S; Saboorian MH; Ashfaq R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Oct; 27(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 12357503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
