These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Use of a cervical brush for Papanicolaou smear collection. A meta-analysis. Bauman BJ J Nurse Midwifery; 1993; 38(5):267-75. PubMed ID: 8246082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis. Lee KR; Manna EA; St John T Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Oct; 13(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8575278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush. Partoll LM; Javaheri G Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing tubal metaplasia from endocervical dysplasia on cervical Papanicolaou smears. Van Le L; Novotny D; Dotters DJ Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 2):974-6. PubMed ID: 1923244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears. Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush. Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endocervical glandular atypia in Papanicolaou smears. Goff BA; Atanasoff P; Brown E; Muntz HG; Bell DA; Rice LW Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jan; 79(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 1727566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush. Lo L; Jordan J Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The immediate postconization endocervical smear: evaluation of its utility in the detection of residual dysplasia. Frauchiger WL; De Frias DV; Cajulis RS; Yu GH Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(5):1139-43. PubMed ID: 9755671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of endocervical canal topography, tubal metaplasia, and high canal sampling on the cytologic presentation of nonneoplastic endocervical cells. Babkowski RC; Wilbur DC; Rutkowski MA; Facik MS; Bonfiglio TA Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Apr; 105(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 8604682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early endocervical glandular neoplasia. II. Morphometric analysis of the cells. Clark AH; Betsill WL Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 3457504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nylon brush improves collection of cervical cytologic specimens. Dotters DJ; Carney CN; Droegemueller W Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Oct; 159(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 3177528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center. Szarewski A; Curran G; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Kocjan G; Bounds W; Guillebaud J Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 8328239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy. Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal. Andersen W; Frierson H; Barber S; Tabbarah S; Taylor P; Underwood P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 3048105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]