These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7956667)

  • 21. Evaluation of smears obtained by cervical scraping and an endocervical swab in the diagnosis of neoplastic disease of the uterine cervix.
    Johansen P; Arffmann E; Pallesen G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979; 58(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 484218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cytologic features of endocervical glandular lesions: comparison of SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional smear specimen preparations.
    Belsley NA; Tambouret RH; Misdraji J; Muzikansky A; Russell DK; Wilbur DC
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Apr; 36(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 18335553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
    Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative cytologic yield and quality of three Pap smear instruments.
    Toffler WL; Pluedeman CK; Sinclair AE; Ireland KM; Byrne BJ
    Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8349063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Herpesvirus mimics. A potential pitfall in endocervical brush specimens.
    Stowell SB; Wiley CM; Powers CN
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8291354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush.
    Ferris DG; Berrey MM; Ellis KE; Petry LJ; Voxnaes J; Beatie RT
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 1541953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Apoptosis, proliferation, and expression of p53 and bcl-2 in endocervical glandular intraepithelial lesions and invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma.
    Ali-Fehmi R; Qureshi F; Lawrence WD; Jacques SM
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 14668542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cervex brush versus vaginal-cervical-endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling.
    Järvi K
    Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 9252746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Endometrial cells of the "lower uterine segment" (LUS) in cervical smears obtained by endocervical brushings: a source of potential diagnostic pitfall.
    de Peralta-Venturino MN; Purslow MJ; Kini SR
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 May; 12(3):263-8; discussion 268-71. PubMed ID: 7621724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distribution of epithelial-specific antigen in uterine cervix with endocervical glandular dysplasia.
    Umezaki K; Sanezumi M; Okada H; Okamura A; Tsubra A; Kanazaki H
    Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Sep; 66(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 9299251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Cytobrush quality assurance in endocervical smears].
    Kerl J; Ross A; Hilgarth M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 51(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 2026300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cytologic atypia. Clinical significance and follow-up recommendations.
    Quitllet FA; Morta MC; Cañas A; Castellanos E; Carreras R
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(2):504-6. PubMed ID: 9100788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of ThinPrep preparations with conventional cervicovaginal smears. Practical considerations.
    Bur M; Knowles K; Pekow P; Corral O; Donovan J
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(4):631-42. PubMed ID: 7631535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
    Trimbos JB; Arentz NP
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rates of condyloma and dysplasia in Papanicolaou smears with and without endocervical cells.
    Mauney M; Eide D; Sotham J
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1990; 6(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 2323292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contribution of endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.
    Drescher CW; Peters WA; Roberts JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 6877690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should we report cervical smears lacking endocervical component as unsatisfactory?
    Sidawy MK; Tabbara SO; Silverberg SG
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1992; 8(6):567-70. PubMed ID: 1468332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.