BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7957657)

  • 1. The effects of different sectional arches in canine retraction.
    Dinçer M; Işcan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 7957657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of rate of canine retraction into recent extraction site with and without gingival fiberotomy: a clinical study.
    Kalra A; Jaggi N; Bansal M; Goel S; Medsinge SV; Abraham R; Jasoria G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 24171983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effects of lower canine distalization with sectional arches on the positions of lower incisors and molars].
    Işcan HN
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 2101661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The drum spring (DS) retractor: constant and continuous force for canine retraction.
    Darendeliler MA; Darendeliler H; Uner O
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):115-30. PubMed ID: 9183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of direct and indirect skeletal anchorage systems combined with 2 canine retraction techniques.
    Ozkan S; Bayram M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):763-770. PubMed ID: 27871702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes over time in canine retraction: an implant study.
    Martins RP; Buschang PH; Gandini LG; Rossouw PE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19577153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics.
    Ziegler P; Ingervall B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 2916474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of intraarch mechanics using differential moments for achieving anchorage control in extraction cases.
    Rajcich MM; Sadowsky C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Oct; 112(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 9345157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament: a clinical study.
    Kumar KV; Umashankar K; Kumar DP; Kumar DP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 23404006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical comparison of the rate of maxillary canine retraction into healed and recent extraction sites--a pilot study.
    Häsler R; Schmid G; Ingervall B; Gebauer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):711-9. PubMed ID: 9458604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.
    Sueri MY; Turk T
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 17090165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the dental arch changes in patients with different malocclusions.
    Singh DP; Garg AK; Singh SP; Krishna Nayak US; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 25511063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction:
    da C Monini A; Gandini LG; Vianna AP; Martins RP; Jacob HB
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Jul; 89(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30741577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interseptal bone reduction on the rate of maxillary canine retraction.
    Leethanakul C; Kanokkulchai S; Pongpanich S; Leepong N; Charoemratrote C
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):839-45. PubMed ID: 24592904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical efficiency of nonconventional elastomeric ligatures in the canine retraction phase of preadjusted edgewise appliance therapy: an in-vivo study.
    Dholakia KD; Bhat SR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 22640673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted maxillary canines.
    Olive RJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Nov; 18(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 12462682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.