107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7959281)
1. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy.
Fanning J; Hilgers RD; Palabrica C
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Nov; 55(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 7959281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy: survival, recurrence, and late complications.
Fanning J; Kraus K
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):281-3. PubMed ID: 11063657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radical hysterectomy with the endoscopic stapler.
Brewer CA; Chan J; Kurosaki T; Berman ML
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 9784318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decreasing blood loss in patients treated with radical cystectomy: a prospective randomizes trial using a new stapling device.
Chang SS; Smith JA; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):951-4. PubMed ID: 12576820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases.
Puntambekar SP; Palep RJ; Puntambekar SS; Wagh GN; Patil AM; Rayate NV; Agarwal GA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 17980327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vaginal cuff closure at abdominal hysterectomy: comparing sutures with absorbable staples.
Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Lipscomb GH; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):415-8. PubMed ID: 1876376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study.
Landoni F; Maneo A; Cormio G; Perego P; Milani R; Caruso O; Mangioni C
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jan; 80(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 11136561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.
Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11330939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retroperitoneal radical hysterectomy.
Delgado G; Potkul RK; Dolan JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Feb; 56(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 7896184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].
Wu K; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Li H; Bai P; Li XG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 28(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 16875638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
