398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7959309)
1. [Regionalization in obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint].
Roemer VM
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7959309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Ambulatory surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
Ulsenheimer K
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 7959314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission].
Cyran W
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint exemplified by breech presentation].
Hickl EJ
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):184-90. PubMed ID: 7959303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Monitoring labor from the forensic viewpoint].
Schneider KT
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):212-21. PubMed ID: 7959307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Counseling center for forensic expert questions of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Professional Society of Gynecologists].
Ratzel R; Schneider J; Ludwig H
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 7959313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Ultrasound studies within the scope of prenatal diagnosis from the forensic viewpoint].
Rauskolb R
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 7959304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Legal problems in obstetrics. On the "liability of the expert witness"].
Martius G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Sep; 55(9):505-9. PubMed ID: 7498718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Medical malpractice from the physician's viewpoint].
Carstensen G
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 8588425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bad "bad baby" bills.
Mehlman MJ
Am J Law Med; 1994; 20(1-2):129-45. PubMed ID: 7801974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Liability of the expert witness].
Jansen C
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):632-5. PubMed ID: 9064937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Shoulder dystocia and forensic aspects].
Schwenzer T
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 7959308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Status and function of the anesthesiologic expert witness in the malpractice process].
Ulsenheimer K
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):55-60; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical malpractice: is the testimony expert?
Francis JD
Md Med; 2004; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 15079939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Guidelines in surgery: from the viewpoint of the surgical expert].
Carstensen G
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():79-82. PubMed ID: 9574102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Limits of methodological freedom in anesthesia: from the viewpoint of the legal expert].
Weissauer W
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):48-51; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Prevention of Rhesus incompatibility from the forensic viewpoint].
Behrens O; Schneider J
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 7959306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Treatment errors in breast surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
Mosny DS; Nitz U
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 7959311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Medical standards in legal procedures].
Prien T
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):42-3; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Limits of methodological freedom in anesthesia: from the viewpoint of the medical expert].
Dudziak R
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):52-5; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
