604 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7959313)
1. [Counseling center for forensic expert questions of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Professional Society of Gynecologists].
Ratzel R; Schneider J; Ludwig H
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 7959313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission].
Cyran W
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ambulatory surgery from the forensic viewpoint].
Ulsenheimer K
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 7959314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Regionalization in obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint].
Roemer VM
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7959309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Obstetrics from the forensic viewpoint exemplified by breech presentation].
Hickl EJ
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):184-90. PubMed ID: 7959303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Monitoring labor from the forensic viewpoint].
Schneider KT
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):212-21. PubMed ID: 7959307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Expert witness testimony.
Amon E
Clin Perinatol; 2007 Sep; 34(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 17765495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Algorhythm of making forensic medical expert examinations by medical documents in obstetric-gynecological practice].
Beliaev LV; Nozdriakov KV
Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 17338336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The problems in organizing forensic medical expertise in cases of professional law infringements by medical workers (exemplified by obstetrical-gynecological service)].
Plaksin VO; Gurtovoĭ BL; Oboĭmakov VB
Sud Med Ekspert; 1994; 37(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8184455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Legal problems in obstetrics. On the "liability of the expert witness"].
Martius G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Sep; 55(9):505-9. PubMed ID: 7498718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Ultrasound studies within the scope of prenatal diagnosis from the forensic viewpoint].
Rauskolb R
Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 7959304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Professional liability claims and Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists members: myth versus reality.
Chauhan SP; Chauhan VB; Cowan BD; Hendrix NW; Magann EF; Morrison JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1820-6; discussion 1826-8. PubMed ID: 15970818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Professional liability payments in obstetrics and gynecology.
Barbieri RL
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 107(3):578-81. PubMed ID: 16507927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bad "bad baby" bills.
Mehlman MJ
Am J Law Med; 1994; 20(1-2):129-45. PubMed ID: 7801974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The judiciary: surprising supporters of malpractice reform.
Heland KV
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1990 Feb; 75(2):6-11. PubMed ID: 10103786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. American congress of obstetricians and gynecologists' grievance process.
McKay DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1217. PubMed ID: 20966715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Current legal problems in routine gynecology-obstetric practice].
Ulsenheimer K
Gynakologe; 1990 Apr; 23(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 2365233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 374: Expert testimony.
Committee on Ethics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):445-6. PubMed ID: 17666622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 1992 ACOG survey. Professional liability: is gender a factor?
Malkasian GD
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Nov; 78(11):26-32, 48. PubMed ID: 10129536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Medico-legal controversies in obstetrics and gynecology: an important current problem].
Tropea PF
Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Sep; 47(9):401-7. PubMed ID: 8545042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
