BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7959329)

  • 1. Tubal anastomosis in the rat using the tissue adhesive cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl).
    Haj N; Haj M; Shasha SM; Oettinger M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1994; 38(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 7959329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anastomosis of uterine serosa with cyanoacrylate versus suture in rats.
    Caballero-Gómez JM; Ortega-Moreno J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1993 Apr; 72(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 8385858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and histologic evaluation of laser reanastomosis of the uterine tube.
    Choe JK; Dawood MY; Bardawil WA; Andrews AH
    Fertil Steril; 1984 May; 41(5):754-60. PubMed ID: 6370733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of laser-assisted anastomosis, laser welding, and microsurgical anastomosis of rabbit uterine tubes.
    Kao LW; Giles HR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jan; 81(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 8416446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study.
    Falcone T; Goldberg JM; Margossian H; Stevens L
    Fertil Steril; 2000 May; 73(5):1040-2. PubMed ID: 10785235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laser-assisted tubal anastomosis.
    Kao LW; Giles HR
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug; 40(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 7473456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tubal reanastomosis by microsurgery.
    Gomel V
    Fertil Steril; 1977 Jan; 28(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 832717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carbon dioxide laser tissue welding: an alternative technique for tubal anastomosis?
    Wallwiener D; Meyer A; Bastert G
    J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1997; 15(4):163-9. PubMed ID: 9612164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic non-microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: A retrospective cohort study.
    van de Water M; Bosteels J; De Sutter P; Weyers S
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2015 Jun; 20(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25545287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Successful term pregnancies after tubal anastomosis utilizing contralateral tubal segments.
    West ST; Marana R
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 2565302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intramural-isthmic fallopian tube anastomosis facilitated by the carbon dioxide laser.
    Vilos GA
    Fertil Steril; 1991 Sep; 56(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 1909979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Successful tubal anastomosis utilizing contralateral tubal segment in a case of unicornous uterus with a rudimentary horn].
    Sato K; Kojima T; Takahashi K
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Nov; 42(11):1595-7. PubMed ID: 2273319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional versus laser reanastomosis of rabbit ligated uterine horns.
    Choe JK; Dawood MY; Andrews AH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jun; 61(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 6843925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of tubal surgery with the CO2 laser and the unipolar microelectrode.
    Fayez JA; McComb JS; Harper MA
    Fertil Steril; 1983 Oct; 40(4):476-80. PubMed ID: 6617907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of two simplified microsurgical techniques for uterine horn anastomosis in rat.
    Caballero-Gómez JM; Ortega-Moreno J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1993; 252(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 8512348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiology of the rabbit oviduct following tubal microsurgery.
    Archer DR; Eddy CA; Pauerstein CJ
    Fertil Steril; 1979 Apr; 31(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 428589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Is microsurgical preserving operation of tubal pregnancy sensible?].
    Pelzer V; Severing K; Schlösser HW
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Jun; 50(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 2376306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effects of different methods of anastomosis on rat uterine horn.
    Adamyan LV; Myinbayev OA; Ishrat J; Kulakov VI
    Int J Fertil; 1992; 37(6):368-72. PubMed ID: 1360459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absorbable external rings for anastomosis of the fallopian tubes: a feasibility study.
    Weinrib HP; Dmowski WP
    Fertil Steril; 1985 Sep; 44(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 4029432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Successful repeat microsurgical fallopian tube anastomosis. A case report.
    Apodaca CC; Gililland JL
    J Reprod Med; 1995 May; 40(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 7608888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.