These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7960629)

  • 1. Low-density supradiaphragmatic band artifact on advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography of the chest.
    Heelan RT; Rothenberg LN; Caravelli JF; Fleischman RC; Castellino RA
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Aug; 29(8):777-80. PubMed ID: 7960629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Small object contrast in AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Chotas HG; Van Metter RL; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 1871306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
    Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
    Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pacemaker wires. Difference in performance between AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Fransson SG
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):419-21. PubMed ID: 8318310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
    Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography: receiver operating characteristic comparison with screen-film chest radiography.
    Swensen SJ; Aughenbaugh GL; Brown LR; Harms GF; Karsell PR; Gray JE; Ilstrup DM; Hodge DO
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1998 Jul; 73(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 9663191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variable compensation technique for digital radiography of the chest.
    Dobbins JT; Powell AO
    Radiology; 1989 Nov; 173(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 2798877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
    Itouji E; Kono M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography.
    Vlasbloem H; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3420279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alveolar consolidation detection: advanced multiple beam equalization radiography versus conventional chest radiography.
    Nichols RD; Gurney JW; Jones KK; Robbins RA; Rennard SI
    Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 8451438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of scanning equalization and conventional chest radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 2772170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visualization of basal pleural space and lung with advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER).
    Aarts NJ; Oestmann JW; Kool LJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Feb; 16(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 8462578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.
    Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5238-51. PubMed ID: 26328973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit of iodine density images to reduce out-of-field image artifacts at rapid kVp switching dual-energy CT.
    Dotson B; Lambert JW; Wang ZJ; Sun Y; Ohliger MA; Winklhofer S; Yeh BM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Mar; 42(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 27847997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.