381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7960664)
1. The right to die.
Powell JA; Cohen AS
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
Harner SR
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1996 Jun; (208):9-75. PubMed ID: 10158433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced directives, the right to die and the common law: recent problems with blood transfusions.
Stewart C
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 23(1):161-83. PubMed ID: 12678066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports.
Vaux K
J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
Calder M
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
Fader JF
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The duty to care--the right to refuse. Changing roles of patients and physicians in end-of-life decision making.
Garwin M
J Leg Med; 1998 Mar; 19(1):99-125. PubMed ID: 9564096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dying at the right time: a critical legal theory approach to timing-of-death issues.
Ikuta SS
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):3-66. PubMed ID: 2695495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance.
Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The law of assisted suicide.
Garbesi GC
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(2):93-111. PubMed ID: 3692742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues.
Snyder L
J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
Liacos PJ
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 2621092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is "substituted judgment" a valid legal concept?
Robertson ED
Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(2):197-214. PubMed ID: 2621091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
